Epstein Secrets

TEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTA

roduct protection as to grand jury materials). Exhibit B, at 36 n.13. Epstein also files as Exhibit C the August 4, 2010, hearing transcript; In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09- 34791-BKC-RBR, The following are statements made

F HIS SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR COURT TO DECLARE RELEVANCE AND NON-PRIVILEGED NATURE OF DOCUMENTS, ETC. As supplemental authority in support of his Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non- Privileged Nature of Documents and with Specific Request for In Camera Review to Determine Relevance, Inapplicability

TEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING ON COURT'S TRIAL DOCKET (Adds Item N

EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individua

s Permission to Alter Trial Evidence by Replacing Names with Initials of Edwards' Three Clients on Trial Exhibits [D.E. 1240] 15 3/5/18 Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary and Appointment of Special Ma

'EENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO MAKE C

EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individua

ndix in Support of Response in Opposition to Edwards' Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence, and D.E. 1252, Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for 2 EFTA00793756 Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing and

Trial Exhibits 7.50 0.00 03/03/18 SJL Work on Response to Motion to B. Edwards' Compel re Request for Admissions; strategize re default against S. Rothstein and options to proceed with trial or seek to strike trial setting; work on preparations for special set hearings; work on trial preparations 7.30

from Trial Docket in Order to Comply With the Mandate Set Forth in Rule 1.440; work on Response to B. Edwards' Motion for Separate Trials; work on Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary and Appointment of Special M

0.00 Summary of Damages; work on Response to S. Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss; work on strategies 07/05/18

e J. Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials, and Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevant and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents, for purposes of drafting Sworn Declaration of Fact of Scott J. Link, as part of Bankr

2010, May 15, 2013, October 10, 13, and November 10, 2017, deposition transcripts and extrapolate testimony regarding communications/meetings with S. Rothstein to use to show B. Edwards may have been withholding information; review B. Edwards' filings and outlines for disclosure of number of pages produce

e J. Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials, and Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevant and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents, for purposes of drafting Sworn Declaration of Fact of Scott J. Link, as part of Bankr