Epstein Secrets

lEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTE

trial, the total amount paid, again, goes back to that place in time when Mr. Epstein would have brought this lawsuit at or near the time of Mr. Rothstein's arrest; at or near the time of federal and perhaps state agents raiding the offices of the firm; at or near the time of these cases reaching a c

EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Counter-Plaintiff's ore genus motion on December 7, 2017. The Court, having heard argument of counsel does hereby, ORDER AND ADJUDGE that: 1. Plaintiff/Counter-Defen

TEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS THIS CA

EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individua

EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Counter-Plaintiff's ore genus motion on December 7, 2017. The Court, having heard argument of counsel does hereby, ORDER AND ADJUDGE that: 1. Plaintiff/Counter-Defen

OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defendant(s). SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO EPSTEIN'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION D

MBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

control of the Counter- Plaintiff are attached to the extent such documents were to be made available for inspection and copying in accordance with Counter-Plaintiff's Response to Request to Produce dated January 6, 2012. EFTA00624845 Edwards adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Supplemental Response

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J, EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH C

any actions allegedly taken by Epstein. In fact, this litigation with Epstein catapulted Edwards from an unknown solo practitioner to a partner at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler. Moreover, Edwards still utilizes his litigious association with Mr. Epstein at his new firm Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fi

ns in Paragraph 5 contain annotations that are wholly inapposite, unprincipled, needlessly inflammatory, and serve no purpose other than to bolster Counter-Plaintiff's allegations and as such no response is warranted. 6. Epstein denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 6 and demands strict proof thereof. 7.

4777 FAX (561) 8354691 June 4, 2014 John R. Beranek, Esquire AUSLEY & McMULLEN, P.A. Post Office Box 391 Tallahassee, FL 32302 Re: Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Dear John: Enclosed please find the following: 1. Our Motion for Summary Judgment (w/o attachments) 2. Scarola's Memorandum in Oppo

nt (w/o attachments) 2. Scarola's Memorandum in Opposition (w/o attachments) 3. Transcript of the hearing on our Motion for Summary Judgment 4. Counter-Plaintiff's two Notices of Supplemental Authority 5. Order Granting our Motion for Summary Judgment 6. Final Judgment Please note that the second "Supplemen

0.00 Summary of Damages; work on Response to S. Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss; work on strategies 07/05/18

lyze, and scrutinize multiple relevant case documents, including lengthy transcript of the Math 8, 2018 hearing involving Fowler White disk issue, Counter-Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Show Cause in bankruptcy court and Bankruptcy Court's Order to Show Cause, pertinent Complaints filed in Circuit Court case an