Epstein Secrets

do that transaction on II against Brad Edward➢ accusing him of having been a II behalf of Jeffrey Epstein•a victims? 12 knowing participant in Scott Rothstein'➢ Rani 12 MR. LINK: Object to the form. 13 scheme -- 13 NITHESS: Nell, it was the right 14 MR. LINK: Object to the form. 14 thing to do.

e had reached the point where in 2008 you faced the economic reality of having to leave the bench. where did you than go? A I was hired by the Rothstein, Rosonfoldt a Adler firm. O How did that cone about? A As I said, I was interviewing with two firms. 10 There wore two largo firma that had

nd I think I met Spencer Kuvin. I just 7 believe the witness has finished his 7 can't place exactly where it wan. It wasn't at the 8 response. S Rothstein office. And I just don't -- it was somewhere 1 THE WITNESS: And wo keep talking about t in Went Palm Beach -- at a law firm in West Palm. 10 mo

1,8 61:6,8,18 61:21 62:3,8,24 62:25 86:16,19 shareholders 24:1,7 24:12 28:8 60:20 60:23 62:17,20 shares 61:12,15 sharing 43:20 sheriff 66:11 SHIPLEY 2:15 shock 30:4 158:16 shocked 28:24 shoes 27:1 shooting 11:9 shop 7:18 shots 45:9 show40:2 117:24 133:14 145:20,22 149:15 showed 16:16 58:

EENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, -VS- SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS' MOTION TO STRIKE

URLINGTON Florida Bar No. 285862 By:/s/ Nichole J. Segal NICHOLE J. SEGAL Florida Bar No. 41232 /kbt 6 EFTA00613506 SERVICE LIST Epstein v. Rothstein/Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB W. Chester Brewer, Jr., Esq. W. CHESTER BREWER, JR., P.A. 250 S. Australian Ave., Ste. 1400 West Palm Beac

dismiss), rev. denied, 81 So. 3d 414 (Fla. 2012). STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS In December 2009, Appellee, Jeffrey Epstein, filed suit against Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein") and Appellant, Bradley J. Edwards, based upon Epstein's justifiable belief at the time of filing his Complaint that these two individu

581 75 31:12 41:20,21 resulted (1) 26:1 review (3) 10:13 26:17 44:9 46:6 56:21 Sasser's (5) second (3) 25:11 29:9 31:20 securities (1) SHIPLEY (1) 2:18 shoes (2) 52:10,11 31:13 34:3 59:4 sorry (2) 8:20 29:8 sort (1) 35:13 57:15 26:9,11 29:14 33:10 short (1) 33:20 59:17 43:11 47

A040800XXXXMBAG Y EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

IRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Y EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and individually, Defendant(s). NOTICE OF HEARING YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the undersigned

PKINS • 0•1•01WI HOOP.. waifs,. MOWS a aMos PETER LOVi MOO norm PITCHen ..v.Ak POICY VOYSill A STEN SEARCY DENNEY. SCAROLA BARNHART art—SHIPLEY. October 13, 2010 Via &Mall and U.S. Mail Joseph L. Ackerman, I squire Fowler White Burnett, M. 901 Phillips Point West 777 S Flagler Drive W

I had been informed repeatedly that they 7 participated in a major fraud with a man named 7 were in it for the money and that they expected to 8 Rothstein. that he should be in jail for the 8 earn a lot of money from representing her and others 9 Rothstein events. 9 in this case and that they pretend

ame, but 10 matter? 10 I don't remember his name. 11. A. Well. I cant imagine that mite relying 11 Another was — I mean — just hard to 12 on Scott Rothstein's credibility. 12 pinpoint names. but it was something that was 13 Q. I'm asking, did you know? 13 clearly in my mind that so many people were te

697:16 703:24 760:22 762:8 768:18 769:17 684:11 776:22 www.phippsreporting.com (888)811-3408 EFTA00602493 21 sent (3) 677:10 771:21 774:2 SHIPLEY (1) 649:4 shocked (3) 747:15 Simpson (38) 649:19 652:15 small (10) 675:12,14,19 676:8,13,18 650:13 652:24 652:25 653:13 653:17 655:25 sen

THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING PROCEEDINGS DATE TAKEN: Monday, January 27, 2014 TIME:

row 3 involving this case, I had no knowledge whatsoever 4 that a separate and independent action had been 5 brought by Mr. Epstein against the Rothstein 6 entities and Mr. Edwards. So to that extent, I 7 just to want let you know, as you probably already 8 did already know, that I handled those

ts (3) 25:21 37:21 58:10 settled (2) 44:20,20 settlement (4) 15:23 36:1 42:11 45:8 settlements (4) 32:24 35:14,18 37:3 settles (1) 35:11 SHIPLEY (1) 2:18 shoes (2) 52:10,11 short (1) 56:15 showed (1) 34:7 shows (3) 31:25 43:21 44:16 side (11) 3:19 10:6,7 13:22 15:21,25 37:5 52:6

at has JEFFREY EPSTEIN, S transpired is of extreme consternation to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, vs. 4 the court. It has caused me to have to SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; 7 engage in an inordinate amount of time to BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, 8 the exclusion of other natters that needed Defendan

ion for trial on May 24th, 2017. There is no dispute. And Mr. Edwards has actually pointed it out, Mr. Epstein did not have a default against Mr. Rothstein. Contrary to what Mr. Edwards' suggestion is, is to cure this issue -- 10 THE COURT: Mr. Epstein did not have a 11 default against Mr. Rothstein

RE ^ docket relative to Florida Rule of Civil 9 For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: Procedure 1.440 first. SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART C 8 SHIPLEY, P.A. e MR. SCAROLA: Good morning, Your Honor. With the Court's permission, believe it or 9 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE :0 not, there is ono agre

COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and III individually, Defendants. TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING PROCEEDINGS DATE TAKEN: December 17, 2

26f9-4cfa-bba3-4354ecd33a52 EFTA00598449 3 1 Thereupon, 2 the following proceedings began at 10:02 3 THE COURT: Okay. This is 4 Epstein vs. Rothstein. This is the motion of 5 the counterplaintiff for -- to add punitive 6 damages. I reviewed the materials you guys had 7 sent to me. I got the m

2:14 see 4:1 self-incrimina... 11.10 sense 18:18 sent 3:7 serial 7:4 served 9:4 set 3:22 5:7 16:7 settled 9:5 settlements 9:7 sexual 13:8 SHIPLEY 2:14 short 13:1 shortly 19:3 show 15:2 shows 13:13 sir 4:20 9:16 17:22 19:9 sit 6:6 sitting 6:2 six 13:1 ski 3:23 solely 4:25 6:16 sorry

3,5 47:1 48:8 rights 29:18 rise 3: I RMR 1:23 50:8,19 ROBINSON 2:10 Rockenbach 10:18,19 13:22 15:15,24 17:7 20:18 Rosenfeldt 1:5 3:7 11:21 Rothstein 1:5 3:7 11:21 24:17,23 25:4 Rothstein's 11:22 RPR 1:23 50:8,19 rule 15:10 32:1,7 ruled 23:16 ruling 25:24 Run 41:4 S same 13:25 17:7 23:16

equestration 34:20 serious 17:18 served 31:17 serving 12:23 set 25:25 41:11 setting 46:7 seven 26:5 40:11,13 41:25 sexual 42:5 Shapiro 5:13 SHIPLEY 2:4 short 16:7 Shorthand 50:8 show 5:9 15:10,20 16:13 31:17 32:21 33:16,19 34:7 35:1 38:18,18 40:19 41:10 46:19 showed 36:20 showing 35:1 s

A Ramiro Viratelt I 9 CARA L. HOLMES, ESQUIRE ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Tuesday, October, 20. 2009 40t

200 21 On behalf of Plaintiff In related Case No. 08-80811 22 JACK HILL. ESQUIRE IP/weary via speakerphone) SEARCY. DENNEY, SCAFIOLA BARNHART e• SHIPLEY 23 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 24 Phone: 561.686.6300 25 2 4 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 - - - 2

oduction 188:11,14 192:18 173:3 174:19,20 217:15 189:10 ROSENFELDT 180:14,15 179:16 resign 191:7 133:9 184:1 182:3,4,14 186:3 192:25 ROTHSTEIN saying ESQUIRE u•Aleusin Gab•Compass Toll Free: 866.709.8777 Facsimile: 501.394.3621 Suite 600 4440 PGA Boulevard Palm Beach Gardens, FL 3341

178:5 168:7 197:18 single 177:20 179:15 172:10,24 179:20,22 180:9 206:2 206:5 seeing 149:25 156:18 205:3 seen 159:13 163:4 163:7,19 SHIPLEY 133:22 shorthand 217:7 show 147:13 160:7 161:22 168:21 170:10 173:14 191:9 196:7 156:22 205:5 sir 139:16 141:13 143:2 144:10,19 144: