Epstein Secrets

KR. SCAROLA: May I now to this podium now? JEFFREY EPSTEIN, biaintirs/countor -Defendant, vs 4 THE CO1RT: Sure. 'at. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; • Your 110nOr, have we decided what notions were BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, , going to hoar? boranciants/countor -Plaintiffs

ng CO your Honor that 12 during a very CUTUICUOUSI period of CIAO these would I) the first notice we got of an Intent CO attempt. to to be the Rothstein fines, erployee. 14 use chose documents was March S. The first notice 14 KR. SMOLA: Yes, air. Let ne go through IS wo got of an intent CO attem

did not improperly obtain thee, nor were they inadvertently disclosed co us. 4 earlier attempted to exclude the surprise testimony • THE COURT: Tina Campbell is your paralegal? 5 by an unsuccessful notion in limlne. Furthermore, a MS. RCCICENBACH: 4010 obtained the three boxes, 4 prejudice in the con

KR. SCAROLA: May I now to this podium now? JEFFREY EPSTEIN, biaintirs/countor -Defendant, vs 4 THE CWRT: Sure. 'at. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; • Your Honor, have we wowed what notions were BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, boranciants/countor -Plaintiffs. , 10 going to hoa

ng CO your Honor that 12 during a very CUTUICUOUSI period of CIAO these would I) the first notice we got of an Intent CO attempt. to to be the Rothstein fines, erployee. 14 use chose documents was March S. The first notice 14 KR. SMOLA: Yes, air. Let ne go through IS wo got of an intent CO attem

did not improperly obtain thee, nor were they inadvertently disclosed co us. 4 earlier attempted to exclude the surprise testimony • THE COURT: Tina Campbell is your paralegal? 5 by an unsuccessful notion in limlne. Furthermore, a MS. RCCICENBACH: 4010 obtained the three boxes, 4 prejudice in the con

issue for this Court to decide on October 26, 2018, is if Fowler White and/or Epstein violated the November 2010 Agreed Order. 2Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards, 15'" Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXX_XMBAG. 3 EFTA00794258 On August 14, 2018, pursua

UDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., Debtor. CASE NO. 09-347

25:8-26:15). Mr. Link was also asked a long line of questions about his firm's review of the disc after its discovery: Q. How did she [Paralegal Tina Campbell] review the disc contents? Rockenbach (counsel for Mr. Link): I am going to object on the basis of, not only work product protection, but that thi

KR. LINK: I understand. Your Honor, may I respected coach and former coach of the Heat -- a have one ninute to confer with appellate counsel to Scott Rothstein wan sitting on thin stuff. That's 7 ado sure there's nothing I need to do to preserve i not what happened hero. That's the point that I'm • this

an agreement. And 19 THE COUR?: I nay have font you. ?he 74,000 in our agreement, your court order says no 20 pages wore self-generated from the Rothstein firm: additional exhibits unless the parties agree. In 21 MR. LINK: Yes. And delivered by the trustee the pretrial stip Kr. scarola and I agree

inadvertently disclo.. And it aaya, quote, 'The opposing party also a to us. i earlier attempted to exclude the surprise testimony 4 THE CURT: Tina Campbell is your paralegal' • by an unsuccessful notion in limlne. Furthernare, 5 /12. ROCWITEACH: Who obtained the three boxes. prejudice in the context

RDALE Case No. 09-34791-RBR Chapter 11 IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., Debtor VIDEOTAPED DEPOS

e delivered to the Link firm, they were done in two stages. The first stage, the Link firm came to our office -- I believe it was Scott and mostly Tina Campbell -- to review the documents. They flagged certain documents that they wanted to have received. We provided copies of the hard documents that they