Epstein Secrets

nt. Edwards Mitt 11 I I.24. She is also a co- defendant with Edwards in Epstein's racketeering and fraud suit against both Edwards and M. as well as Scott Rothstein. Edwards' former law partner. ee infra. Kam incorrectly states that "Imlore recent cases" in this Circuit and District have demoted the showing req

more so in light of Epstein's admission in his lawsuit against M. and others that he that he was "one of M's many `Johns.— See Complaint Epstein v. Rothstein, Edwards & M s, No. 50 2009 CA0 40800 (Cir. Ct., 15th Jud. Cir., Palm Beach Co.. Dec. 7, 2009) at 146(a), pertinent pages annexed as Ex. E to the C

Department of Justice 413 F.3d 53 (D.C. Cir. 2005) 2 L.W. ex rel. Whitson v. Knox County Bd. of Educ. 36 Media L. Rep. 1721 (E.D. Tenn. 2008) 5 Medina v. United Christian Evangelistic Ass'n No. 08-22111-CIV, 2009 WL 5066675 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 15. 2009) 6 New York Times Co. v. Gonzales, 459 F.3d 160

N AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defendants. Motion to Compel Bradley Edwards To Appear For Follow-Up Depos

Accordingly, EPSTEIN states: I. Introduction As this court is aware, attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler, P.A. for personal greed and enrichment, in betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties to their own clients and prof

In sum, nothing in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure forbids a second EFTA00728269 Epstein v. Rothstein. et at Page 6 discovery deposition. Medina v. Yoder Auto Sales. Inc., 743 So.2d 621, 622-623 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) and Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.280. 10. As defined by §90.401, Fla.Evid.Code, "relev

N AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defendants. Motion to Compel Bradley Edwards To Appear For Follow-Up Depos

Accordingly, EPSTEIN states: I. Introduction As this court is aware, attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler, P.A. for personal greed and enrichment, in betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties to their own clients and prof

In sum, nothing in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure forbids a second EFTA00728262 Epstein v. Rothstein. et at Page 6 discovery deposition. Medina v. Yoder Auto Sales. Inc., 743 So.2d 621, 622-623 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) and Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.280. 10. As defined by §90.401, Fla.Evid.Code, "relev

nt. Edwards Mitt 11 I I.24. She is also a co- defendant with Edwards in Epstein's racketeering and fraud suit against both Edwards and M. as well as Scott Rothstein. Edwards' former law partner. ee infra. 1° Doe incorrectly states that "Imlore recent cases" in this Circuit and District have demoted the showing

ges in his complaint against M. 13 12 The document is available online at http://www.scribd.com/doc/23947743/121009-epstein. "Complaint, Epstein v. Rothstein et al., II 42(h)(i) ("M. testified that she ... worked at various strip clubs; is an admitted prostitute and call girl; has a history of illegal dru

Department of Justice 413 F.3d 53 (D.C. Cir. 2005) 2 L.W. ex rel. Whitson v. Knox County Bd. of Educ. 36 Media L. Rep. 1721 (E.D. Tenn. 2008) 5 Medina v. United Christian Evangelistic Ass'n No. 08-22111-CIV, 2009 WL 5066675 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 15. 2009) 6 New York Times Co. v. Gonzales, 459 F.3d 160