Epstein Secrets

Liability Company, by its manager, Bahia Property IS,agement, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, by its co-manager, Scott Rothstein; (B12) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in QTask; frW.i (313) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Broward Bank erce; (814) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bov

thereafter through in or about November 2009, \ \\;\ in Broward County, in the Soutite \District of Florida and elsewhere, the defendant, /SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, 1,1eZNIK did knowingly conspi federate, and agree with persons known and unknown to the United States Atto mmit offenses against the United Sta

se of Conspiracy to Commit Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud and to 't re Fraud as set forth in Counts 3, 4, and 5 of the Information, the defendant, S . OTHSTEIN, shall forfeit to the United States, all property, real or personal, which eons! tes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the offense. 5. The

E.W./L.M.: "What the evidence is really going to show is that Mr. Epstein — at least dating back as completely irrelevant r subject matter of the Civil EFTA00795603 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 17 far as our investigation and resources have permitted, back to 1997 or '98 — has every single day o

KR. SCAROLA: May I now to this podium now? JEFFREY EPSTEIN, biaintirs/countor -Defendant, vs 4 THE CO1RT: Sure. 'at. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; • Your 110nOr, have we decided what notions were BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, , going to hoar? boranciants/countor -Plaintiffs

ng CO your Honor that 12 during a very CUTUICUOUSI period of CIAO these would I) the first notice we got of an Intent CO attempt. to to be the Rothstein fines, erployee. 14 use chose documents was March S. The first notice 14 KR. SMOLA: Yes, air. Let ne go through IS wo got of an intent CO attem

ot 10 And those two eases together stand for the It just put someone on the stand co talk about hits. 11 basic principle that you may not loose Civil 12 Thank you, Judge. 12 liability solely upon the assertion of e Fifth 13 THE COURT: Okay. I was writing as wo were I) Armodnent privilege. B

KR. SCAROLA: May I now to this podium now? JEFFREY EPSTEIN, biaintirs/countor -Defendant, vs 4 THE CWRT: Sure. 'at. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; • Your Honor, have we wowed what notions were BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, boranciants/countor -Plaintiffs. , 10 going to hoa

ng CO your Honor that 12 during a very CUTUICUOUSI period of CIAO these would I) the first notice we got of an Intent CO attempt. to to be the Rothstein fines, erployee. 14 use chose documents was March S. The first notice 14 KR. SMOLA: Yes, air. Let ne go through IS wo got of an intent CO attem

ot 10 And those two eases together stand for the It just put someone on the stand co talk about hits. 11 basic principle that you may not loose Civil 12 Thank you, Judge. 12 liability solely upon the assertion of e Fifth 13 THE COURT: Okay. I was writing as wo were I) Armodnent privilege. B

ifferent litigation in which he himself — not Jane Doc — is a party. Specifically, in January 2010 the managing partner of Edwards' former law firm, Scott Rothstein, pled guilty and was sentenced to 50 years in prison for a massive "Ponzi" scheme in which he defrauded investors of $1.2 billion by convincing the

brought a civil lawsuit against Edwards in Florida state court in which he alleges that Edwards was involved in, or knew or should have known about, Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, and pleads claims against Edwards for fraud and violation of Florida's racketeering statute as well as an abuse of process claim al

vance to a significant issue in the case, and are not reasonably obtainable from other available sources" (quoting Gonzales, 194 F.3d at 36)) with.. Civil Rights Law § 79-h(c) (to overcome state Shield Law privilege for non-confidential material, party must make "a clear and specific showing" that the

tein's attorneys and USAO 12/9/2009 Black Ltr re Rothstein Complaints (green file folder) Epstein redwell w

e Doe case (DE27); DE 99 Order; Westlaw research on Obstruction of Justice Charges can be based on false statements in state depositions, including Civil depo, if it is likely to be turned over to federal investigation; DE15-2 Exhibit A; "Prince's friendship with pedophile causes furor across the pond

Doe v. Epstein Page No. 26 Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Su

Procedure." §2255 is contained in "Part 1. Crimes, Chap. 110. Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children." 18 U.S.C. §2255 (2003), is entitled Civil remedy for personal injuries, and provides: EFTA00234847 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2009 Page 4 of 26 Doe

nsel, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Las Olas City Centre 401 East

- "Crimes and Criminal Procedure, Part I. Crimes, Chap. 110. Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children." 18 U.S.C. §2255 (2005), is entitled Civil remedy for personal injuries, and imposes a presumptive minimum of damages in the amount of $50,000, should Plaintiff prove any violation of the sp

16 32:7 risk 9:6 10:6,7 18:25 38:6 40:1041:6,11 risks 21:5 Robert 2:1,8 4:2 6:3 role 25:1317:7 Room 2:23 Rosenfeldt 1:17 rose-colored 11:16 Rothstein 1:17 HPR-CM-RNIR-F... 44:21 RPR-RMR-FCRR... 2:21 rule 39:9 42:13 rules 22:3 25:1 34:24 40:15 42:13 ruling 8:25 42:7 rulings 19:21 23:8 25:2

r says. May I quote Judge Marra. 'If a specific tangible need arises in a civil case the relief should be sought in that case.' In other words, the Civil cases which are in front of Judge Hafele is one forum that Judge Marra said go to it. Judge Marra did not say that this Court does not have Jurisdic