Epstein Secrets

deposition to begin on December 12, 2011, granting a stay to the government. Epstein sought leave of the Bankruptcy Court to take the deposition of Scott Rothstein on December 1, 2011. At that time, Judge Ray denied the Motion without prejudice, because there was no time in the schedule to depose Mr. Rothstein.

y Edwards. The Statement of Undisputed Facts is identical to the one used for Edwards' first Motion for Summary Judgment. EFTA00808026 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Div. AG Epstein's Response in Opposition to Edwards' MSJ to obtain summary judgment. Third, Edwards has

7 So. 2d 355, 357 (Ha. 1s' DCA 1996); Albelo v. Southern Bell, 682 So.2d 1126, 1129 (Ha. 4'h DCA 1996). Finally, summary judgments are not favored. O'Connor v. Marston, 717 So. 2d 82 (Ha. 5th DCA, 1998). It is also necessary for the movant to authenticate the undisputed facts upon which its claim for s

ifferent litigation in which he himself — not Jane Doc — is a party. Specifically, in January 2010 the managing partner of Edwards' former law firm, Scott Rothstein, pled guilty and was sentenced to 50 years in prison for a massive "Ponzi" scheme in which he defrauded investors of $1.2 billion by convincing the

brought a civil lawsuit against Edwards in Florida state court in which he alleges that Edwards was involved in, or knew or should have known about, Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, and pleads claims against Edwards for fraud and violation of Florida's racketeering statute as well as an abuse of process claim al

4, 15, 16 McGarry v. University ojSan Diego, 64 Cal. Rptr. 3d 467 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007) 28, 29 iii D14'71584534593 3970112-000042 EFTA00596452 O'Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 (1975) 13 O'Neill v. Oakgrove Coast. Inc., 71 1.2d 521, 528 ad 1 (1988) 1, 2, 22 People ex reL Scott v. Silverstein

RCUITCOURT OF TIIE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM DEACFI COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE No.502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff , SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and , individually, Defendants. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

ons where people who 10 have absolutely nothing to do with any of Mr. Edwards', 11 have nothing to do with this case whatsoever have been 11 Mr. Rothstein's or their clients' claims, by bringing in 12 brought into the case by Mr. Edwards in an attempt to 12 the names of friends of mine strictly in a

UCE: All right. So we are going to 22 break. We have an agreement on the record that 23 Detective Recarey, and correct me if I am 24 wrong, Ms. O'Connor will get back to us through 25 you sometime next week with a few available 46 (Pages 307 to 310) PROSE COURT REPORTING AGENCY, INC. Electronical

must only make a prima facie showing of venue.- Rothstein v. Harstad, Civ. No. 2:10-01421, 2010 WL 3259789,

nd Defendant's other attempts to dispute the allegations of Plaintiffs' FAC must be construed in Plaintiffs' favor. Metcalfe. 566 F3d at 330 citing O'Connor vs. Sandy Lane Hotel Co., 496 F.3d 312, 316 (3d Cir. 2007). I. Defendant Fancelli Paneling, Inc. Transacted Business in the Territory. This Court

ywood. Me- morial service Saturday. Rodriguez, Eugenio, 64, of West Palm Beach. died June 2. All County Funeral Home and Cre- matory. Like Worth. Rothstein, Violet, 86, of Boca Raton, died Tuesday. Levitt- Weinstein Memorial Chapel, West Palm Beach. Service Friday. Rulz,Mada 1,83, of Boca Raton, die

nd counselors, said spokes- man Tim O'Connor "One of the counselors tested positive and there are two other kids we as- sume are positive," said O'Connor, adding that public-health nurses have been calling families whose chiklren became sick. "We're not finding any severities," he said. O'Co