Epstein Secrets

OURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and individually, Defendant, RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S RENEWED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DI

Summary of Action' in the Complaint, which includes the following allegations: Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers . . . at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, 5., for personal greed and enrichment, in betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties to their own clients and profe

in one or more rebuttal experts, assuming Epstein would be able to overcome multiple legal challenges to the admissibility of Mr. Smith's opinions. Daubert/Fabre challenges are likely. Admissibility hinges on the extent to which legal opinions invade the province of the Court to decide probable cause a

KR. SCAROLA: May I now to this podium now? JEFFREY EPSTEIN, biaintirs/countor -Defendant, vs 4 THE CO1RT: Sure. 'at. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; • Your 110nOr, have we decided what notions were BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, , going to hoar? boranciants/countor -Plaintiffs

ng CO your Honor that 12 during a very CUTUICUOUSI period of CIAO these would I) the first notice we got of an Intent CO attempt. to to be the Rothstein fines, erployee. 14 use chose documents was March S. The first notice 14 KR. SMOLA: Yes, air. Let ne go through IS wo got of an intent CO attem

iled by 14 character are imodiately lepOred. IS Mr. Link to talk about his seeking a Frye or 15 This is civil. In civil it revive➢ damage➢ If Daubert analysis. 16 proximately caused. And it'➢ not a Frye analysis, 17 MR. BURLINGTON: Correct. That's my reading 17 it'➢ not a Daubert analy➢i➢, it

KR. SCAROLA: May I now to this podium now? JEFFREY EPSTEIN, biaintirs/countor -Defendant, vs 4 THE CWRT: Sure. 'at. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; • Your Honor, have we wowed what notions were BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, boranciants/countor -Plaintiffs. , 10 going to hoa

ng CO your Honor that 12 during a very CUTUICUOUSI period of CIAO these would I) the first notice we got of an Intent CO attempt. to to be the Rothstein fines, erployee. 14 use chose documents was March S. The first notice 14 KR. SMOLA: Yes, air. Let ne go through IS wo got of an intent CO attem

iled by 14 character are imodiately lepOred. IS Mr. Link to talk about his seeking a Frye or 15 This is civil. In civil it revive➢ damage➢ If Daubert analysis. 16 proximately caused. And it'➢ not a Frye analysis, 17 MR. BURLINGTON: Correct. That's my reading 17 it'➢ not a Daubert analy➢i➢, it