Epstein Secrets

dermine Epstein's daimsthat Edwards "ginned up"•the allegations to help his former law partner, imprisoned and disbarred FortLauderdaklawyer Sc:qtt RothstRin, perpetµate a $LQ, billion Ponzi s~heme. CA/Aronberg-0O1064 FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/28/2023 2:27:00 PM The revela

undermine Epstein’s claims that Edwards “ginned up” the allegations to help; his former law partner, imprisoned and disbarred Fort Lauderdale lawyer Scott Rothstein, perpetuate a $1,2 billion Ponzi scheme. CA/Aronberg-00.1064 FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/28/2023 2:27:00 PM NOT A CERTIFIE

ZO, CLERK. 3/28/2023 2:27:00 PM The revelations of the settlements came as part of an ongoingdawsuit:that started as a dispute between Epstein and Rothstein, both billionaires. J A year after Epstein in 2008 pleaded guilty to solicitation of prostitution and procuring a minor for prostitution, he sued Rot

pear in front of you, your Honor. THE COURT: It's my pleasure. MR. WEINBERG: First, as to the conditions, we think your Honor trusted the government, the Bureau of Prisons, to keep our client safe and keep him in civilized conditions. The government will again ask, as to other defendants, that they be detained at the MC

deposition to begin on December 12, 2011, granting a stay to the government. Epstein sought leave of the Bankruptcy Court to take the deposition of Scott Rothstein on December 1, 2011. At that time, Judge Ray denied the Motion without prejudice, because there was no time in the schedule to depose Mr. Rothstein.

y Edwards. The Statement of Undisputed Facts is identical to the one used for Edwards' first Motion for Summary Judgment. EFTA00808026 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Div. AG Epstein's Response in Opposition to Edwards' MSJ to obtain summary judgment. Third, Edwards has

noted, Epstein was lucky to be able to depose Rothstein. Under normal circumstances ( insert cite ), a writ of habeas corpus from a State Court to the Bureau of Prisons is unenforceable and is subject completely to the discretion of the Bureau of Prison Officials ( CVR cite ). It is simply not realistic, believable

MBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

T OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant(s). I NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES PROPOUNDE

M STREET NEW YORK, NY 10013 154. c o Akin S. Ross, Gs q. 155. 156. Alfredo Rodriguez 11349 SW 86TH LN, Miami, FL C/O Federal Public Defender or Bureau of Prisons 157. Scott Rothstein do Mark Nurik One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 EFTA00798057 2. Each contested factual

RT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, -VS- SCOTT individually, EDWARDS, L.M., E.W., Intervenors. ROTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. individually, and and JANE DOE, Respondents CASE NO. 4D18-0762 APPENDIX TO RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS PAGE 1. Non

40800 XXXXMB HONORABLE JUDGE DAVID F. CROW JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT RCTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, and LM, Defendants. DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S MOTI Defendant, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN ("R undersigned counsel and pursuant to Fla. R. Default entered against Defendant, and asserts as follows: ASIDE

thstein. 3. D dan Jtas been housed at the Federal Detention Center, Miami, since December efendant has been pulled out of his cell many times by Bureau of Prisons staff since h arceration to receive service of lawsuits at all hours. 5. To the best of Defendant's knowledge and belief, he does not recall bein

Ron 94:18 160:10 room 2:15 17:12 32:21 76:21 139:15 141:16 Rosa 129:25 131:17 Rosa's 129:25 Rosenfeldt 166:22 Rosovsky 100:19 102:17 Rothschild 72:24 Rothstein 166:22,22 168:21 176:1,2,2 Rothstein's 168:19 170:15 171:1 royal 101:4 129:8 130:19 130:22 132:17 143:14 146:23 190:16 rubbing 114:12,17 rubbish 37:1

nd there's a third 14 component to that, which is having experienced now, 15 the mismanagement and inefficiencies and total 16 dereliction of duty at the Bureau of Prisons. 17 TODD BLANCHE: From BOP. From the Bureau 18 of Prisons. 19 GHISLAINE MAXWELL: Yes. 20 TODD BLANCHE: Okay. Fa

list from sometime between July and 17 August, until when he actually called the FBI in 18 October. So we're talking six months or so. 19 Rothstein's firm was raided a few days 20 after the list went into the FBI's hands, and, 21 subsequently, Rothstein himself was prosecuted for 22 RICO, and I b

nd there's a third 14 component to that, which is having experienced now, 15 the mismanagement and inefficiencies and total 16 dereliction of duty at the Bureau of Prisons. 17 TODD BLANCHE: From BOP. From the Bureau 18 of Prisons. 19 GHISLAINE MAXWELL: Yes. 20 TODD BLANCHE: Okay. Fa

ate a “mechanism to bring an action against Defendant directly.”!” In Paletz, that same inmate brought a similar pro se claim against another inmate, the Federal Bureau of Prisons, the FBI, and the U.S. Attorney General.!'° In a parallel, unpublished decision, the district court dismissed the suit, noting that the CVRA is desig

ch Police Department: Police Case No. 05- 368(1) (May 1, 2006), available at http://goo.gl/fAPFw5; see also Statement of Undisputed Facts, Epstein v. Rothstein, No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG (Fla. Cir. Ct. Sept. 22, 2010), available at http://goo.gl/DzMbe8. 196 See supra notes 178-95 and accompanying text a

e a "mechanism to bring an action against Defendant directly." 1°? In Paletz, that same inmate brought a similar pro se claim against another inmate, the Federal Bureau of Prisons, the FBI, and the U.S. Attorney General. !!° In a parallel, unpublished decision, the district court dismissed the suit, noting that the CVRA is desi

ach Police Department: Police Case No. 05-368(1) (May 1, 2006), available at http://goo.gl/fAPFw5; see also Statement of Undisputed Facts, Epstein v. Rothstein, No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG (Fla. Cir. Ct. Sept. 22, 2010), available at hitp:-//goo.gl/DzMbe8. 196 See supra notes 178-95 and accompanying text