Epstein Secrets

A is currently a debtor in bankruptcy. RRA is not named as a Defendant). FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 9. The United States in United States of America I Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, has brought an action for Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C.

icle or other commodity. THE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CONSPIRATORS 7. The roles of the conspirators were as follows: A. Defendant scorr W. ROTHSTEIN was a shareholder, Chairman and CEO of RRA. Through his position at RRA, defendant ROTHSTEIN promoted, managed, and supervised the administration o

hn, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, has brought an action for Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) against Scott.W. Rothstein who was the chief executive officer and chairman of RRA. Within the information which was filed, the United States of America has identified the ent

nd illegal investment scheme is also evidenced by the filing of Amended Complaint For Dissolution And For Emergency Transfer of Corporate Powers to Stuart A. Rosenfeldt, Or, In The Alternative, For the Appointment of A Custodian or Receiver by ROSENFELDT, and RRA, against ROTHSTEIN, individually. (Case No. 09 05930

r third party investors to invest in any plaintiffs case against Jeffrey Epstein 6. All fee sharing agreements between Bradley J. Edwards, RRA, or Scott W. Rothstein and/or any other attorney or investor relating to any aspect of any plaintiffs case. 7. All investment packages, or information, settlement agreeme

orated Memorandum of Law Page 4 of9 7. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a recent article as saying that he had met with Rothstein as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. He stated "I was convinced it was all a Ponzi scheme and I notified the FBI in de

e entry of an order. Counsel for Defendant wrote and enclosed copies of this motion and proposed agreed orders to Kendall Coffey, Esq., counsel for Stuart A. Rosenfeldt, individually, and Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., Coffey Burlington 2699 South Bayshore Drive, Penthouse, Miami, Florida 33133, and Paul Singerm

ential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. He stated "I was convinced it was all a Ponzi scheme and I notified the FBI in detail how Scotty ROTHSTEIN was hiding behind a legitimate law firm to peddle fake investments." Attorney Sakowitz was also quoted as saying ROTHSTEIN had sophisticated eavesd

ey claim a lack of knowledge when: a. The firm had 24 hour security in the form of Broward County Sheriff's officers on each floor of the offices; b. ROTHSTEIN had 24 hour (firm paid) security at his home; c. Partners/attorneys/staff could not directly access ROTHSTEIN without going through extensive secur

gal investment scheme is also evidenced by the recent filing of Amended Complaint For Dissolution And For Emergency Transfer of Corporate Powers to Stuart A. Rosenfeldt, Or, In The Alternative, For the Appointment of A EFTA00725333 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 16 Custodian or Receiver by ROSENFELDT, individually,

ential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. He stated "I was convinced it was all a Ponzi scheme and I notified the FBI in detail how Scotty ROTHSTEIN was hiding behind a legitimate law firm to peddle fake investments." Attorney Sakowitz was also quoted as saying ROTHSTEIN had sophisticated eavesd

problems with the firm existed when: a. RRA had 24 hour security in the form of Broward County Sheriffs officers on each floor of the law offices; b. ROTHSTEIN had 24 hour (firm paid) security at his home; c. Partners/attorneys/staff could not directly access ROTHSTEIN without going through extensive secur

gal investment scheme is also evidenced by the recent filing of Amended Complaint For Dissolution And For Emergency Transfer of Corporate Powers to Stuart A. Rosenfeldt, Or, In The Alternative, For the Appointment of A Custodian or Receiver by ROSENFELDT, individually, (a named Defendant herein), and RRA, against R

e to preserve the privileges of RRA's former clients. See Order Granting Motion for Protective Order, D.E. 672. 6. Epstein filed a lawsuit against Scott W. Rothstein, L.M.'s counsel Brad Edwards, and L.M. individually.3 Epstein has sought to prove up his meritless claims against Attorney Edwards and L.M., in par

re minors. 2 See Motion for Protective Order to Exclude Production of Privileged Documents and Testimony from Qtask, Inc. [D.E. 355]. 3 Epstein v. Rothstein, et aL, Case #09-CA-040800-MBAG, 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. 4 Dep. Jeffrey Epstein, Epstein v. Rothstein, et al.,

stant United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street 7th Floor Miami, Florida 33132 Phone: (305) 961-9176 Fax: (305) 536-7599 [email protected] Stuart A. Rosenfeldt, Esq. (VIA EMAIL) Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 [email protected]

(RRA is currently a debtor in bankruptcy. RRA is not named as a Defendant). FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 9. The United States in United States of America'. Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, has brought an action for Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C.

d L.M., individually. Accordingly, EPSTEIN states: SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler, P.A. for personal greed and enrichment, in betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties to their own clients and prof

nd illegal investment scheme is also evidenced by the filing of Amended Complaint For Dissolution And For Emergency Transfer of Corporate Powers to Stuart A. Rosenfeldt, Or, In The Alternative, For the Appointment of A Custodian or Receiver by ROSENFELDT, and RRA, against ROTHSTEIN, individually. (Case No. 09 05930

1CR-Cohn, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, has brought an action for Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) against Scott W. Rothstein who was the chief executive officer and chairman of RRA. Within the information which was filed, the United States of America has identified the ent

cordingly, EPSTEIN states: Defendants. COMPLAINT SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler, P.A. for personal greed and enrichment, in betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties to their own clients and prof

nd illegal investment scheme is also evidenced by the filing of Amended Complaint For Dissolution And For Emergency Transfer of Corporate Powers to Stuart A. Rosenfeldt, Or, In The Alternative, For the Appointment of A Custodian or Receiver by ROSENFELDT, and RRA, against ROTHSTEIN, individually. (Case No. 09 05930