Epstein Secrets

FTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. / VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Saturday, 9:07 a.m.

/18 Page 25 of 97 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 in the bankruptcy for the law firm Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler had been subpoenaed to produce emails contained on the server of that law firm? A I don't recall. Q Did it ever come to you

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. CASSELL: Can I just chime in here? Paul Cassell for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, intervenors in the Florida State court action. THEREUPON, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, being a witness in the notice heretofore filed, and being first duly sworn in the above cause, testif

I ON OCTOBER 6, 2011 FOR PURPOSES OF DISCUSSION WITH JEE PLEASE VERIFY NAME OF INFORMANT AND IF IT WOULD BE OF USE IN THE NARRATIVE., a partner of Scott Rothstein at the law firm of Rothstein, Rosefeldt and Adler ("RRA"). RRA, Mr. Rothstein and others at RRA perpetrated the largest Ponzi scheme in Florida's

DISCUSSION WITH JEE PLEASE VERIFY NAME OF INFORMANT AND IF IT WOULD BE OF USE IN THE NARRATIVE., a partner of Scott Rothstein at the law firm of Rothstein, Rosefeldt and Adler ("RRA"). RRA, Mr. Rothstein and others at RRA perpetrated the largest Ponzi scheme in Florida's history, using the very same c

s virtually every weekend to see his mother or brother or to conduct business. Upon initiating the investigation, without any coordination with the Florida State Attorney's Office and in clear conflict with the Justice Department's Petite Policy, Ms. Villafana immediately issued irrelevant official document

communications concerning or containing information derived from documents or data over which a claim of privilege was asserted by or on behalf of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler PA; Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces

FTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. / VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Saturday, 9:07 a.m.

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. CASSELL: Can I just chime in here? Paul Cassell for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, intervenors in the Florida State court action. THEREUPON, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, being a witness in the notice heretofore filed, and being first duly sworn in the above cause, testif

my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth 10 Amendment right under the U.S. Constitution, 11 therefore I'm going to do that. 12 Q Are you saying because Rothstein, 13 Rosenfeld, Adler was determined to be a criminal 14 enterprise or somebody was running a criminal 15 enterprise out of that law firm, that

rms bumped into Joane Doe #3. This shows that his travels back to that location was intential and in conflict with his probation log. COUNT #6 • Florida State Licensed Investigators conducted a surveillance of Jeffrey Epstein. He was observed leaving his residence in his black Escalade, driven by his The