Epstein Secrets

employment with attached Complaint against Scott Rothstein and Bradley]. Edwards 1/4/2010 Villafaria Spen

Exhibit # 12/9/2009 Villafafia Roy Black Letter in response to 11/02/09 letter re Epstein's place of employment with attached Complaint against Scott Rothstein and Bradley]. Edwards 1/4/2010 Villafaria Spencer Kuvin Letter re computer seized by FBI 1/20/2010 Villafafia Roy Black Letter re attorney's f

ial EFTA00224947 EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION TIMELINE Date To From Re: Exhibit # 5/18/2007 Matthew Menchel A. Marie Villafana Email informing Menchel of intent to subpoena Roy Black's private investigator and steps taken to obtain DOJ authorization 26 5/21/2007 Matthew Menchel and Jeff Sloman

6/18/2007 Subpoena to NES, LLC (return date 7/10/07) 6/21/2007 Matthew Menchel A. Marie Villafalia Email re Meeting next week with emails from Menchel to Villafalia (6/21/07) and Villafaria to Menchel (6/21/07) attached ll 6/22/2007 Subpoena to Guys and Dolls (return date 7/10/07) 6/25/2007 Je

tten attorney (Lourie) notes 1 I 7/13/2007 Matthew Menchel A. Marie Villafaria Email re Epstein with email from Menchel (7/5/07), Villafana to Menchel (7/4/07) and Sloman to Villafatia (7/3/07) attached 7/16/2007 Black Villafaria Response to letter regarding subpoena to Paul Lavery for computer

employment with attached Complaint against Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards 1/4/2010 Villafafia Spe

Exhibit # 12/9/2009 Villafafia Roy Black Letter in response to 11/02/09 letter re Epstein's place of employment with attached Complaint against Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards 1/4/2010 Villafafia Spencer Kuvin Letter re computer seized by FBI 1/20/2010 Villafalia Roy Black Letter re attorney's

al EFTA00225432 EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION TIMELINE Date To From Re: Exhibit # 5/18/2007 Matthew Menchel A. Marie Villafatia Email informing Menchel of intent to subpoena Roy Black's private investigator and steps taken to obtain DOJ authorization 26 5/21/2007 Matthew Menchel and Jeff Sloman

ding 18 U.S.C. S 2255 38 7/81/2007 Email from Marie ViKaiak toJeff Molnar], Man Menchel, and Andrew Lourie summarizing proposed plea terms as per Menchel recommendation 39 7/81/07- 8/3/07 7/31/2007.8/3/2007 Entails between Jeff Montan, Matt Moretti, Andrew Louric, and Marie VilLafaria regarding pl

have to register inapplicability of 18 USC 2422 to Epstein's conduct; and reiteration of 2255 concerns. Attachment: 7/6/07 Lefcourt letter Sloman, Menchel, Lourie, and Villafafia with attachments 12/17/2007 Jeff Sloman Marie Villafafia Email inquiring about case status and informing Sloman regarding

al assistants. T EXHIBIT B-30 EFTA00225783 A. Villafaria, Esq. December 9, 2009 Page 3 our part would constitute a breach of the NPA. So the Rothstein lawyers, once again, are using the power of the federal government to perpetrate and further their fraud. And the expense of litigating these cases

letter because other matters have consumed our time and effort. Over the past five weeks, the massive billion-dollar conspiracy created and run by Scott Rothstein has been exposed. On Monday, Mr. Epstein filed a state civil RICO lawsuit charging Rothstein, his partner Brad Edwards, and others with tortuous an

it is whether they can require the defendant to serve a sentence that was not even "available" to State prosecutors. Id. In this case, however, Mr. Menchel has not asked for anything that State prosecutors could not have obtained. The fact that State authorities chose—for unquestionably legitimate reaso

without substantiation, that the proposed State plea agreement failed to vindicate the federal interest. On August 3, 2007, Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Menchel rejected the State's new proposed plea agreement. He flatly stated that "the federal interest will not be vindicated in the absence of a two year te

tein's attorneys and USAO 12/9/2009 Black Ltr re Rothstein Complaints (green file folder) Epstein redwell w

Sloman & Lourie; 7/6/07 Lefcourt & Dershowitz to Sloman; 7/25/07 Lefcourt & Dershowitz to Menchel; 8/2/07 EFTA00066350 Sanchez to Menchel; 8/3/07 Menchel to Sanchez; 9/17/07 to Lekowitz; 10/25/07 Sloman Itr to Davis; 11/8/07 Lefkowitz to Sloman; 11/13/07 Sloman to Lefkowitz (was this sent?); 11/28/07

court to Lourie; 6/18/07 to Lefcourt; 6/25/07 Lefcourt to Sloman & Lourie; 7/6/07 Lefcourt & Dershowitz to Sloman; 7/25/07 Lefcourt & Dershowitz to Menchel; 8/2/07 EFTA00066350 Sanchez to Menchel; 8/3/07 Menchel to Sanchez; 9/17/07 to Lekowitz; 10/25/07 Sloman Itr to Davis; 11/8/07 Lefkowitz to Slom

I ON OCTOBER 6, 2011 FOR PURPOSES OF DISCUSSION WITH JEE PLEASE VERIFY NAME OF INFORMANT AND IF IT WOULD BE OF USE IN THE NARRATIVE., a partner of Scott Rothstein at the law firm of Rothstein, Rosefeldt and Adler ("RRA"). RRA, Mr. Rothstein and others at RRA perpetrated the largest Ponzi scheme in Florida's

DISCUSSION WITH JEE PLEASE VERIFY NAME OF INFORMANT AND IF IT WOULD BE OF USE IN THE NARRATIVE., a partner of Scott Rothstein at the law firm of Rothstein, Rosefeldt and Adler ("RRA"). RRA, Mr. Rothstein and others at RRA perpetrated the largest Ponzi scheme in Florida's history, using the very same c

As a weak explanation of the many complaints about Ms. Villafana's misconduct and her flagrant violations of the USAM, her Criminal Division Chief, Matthew Menchel, eventually characterized her as "unsupervisable." In August 2007, Ms. Villafana demanded that, in exchange for a deferral of federal prosecution,

anges to the victims' rights laws; and (4) to defend against the lawsuit that Epstein filed against Edwards himself (Edwards formerly worked for the Rothstein firm, and Rothstein allegedly used the Epstein lawsuits as a lure for his Ponzi scheme investors). Lilly Ann Sanchez, who has not been involved in

owed me some of the correspondence that they were ordered to produce, I have never been shown any of the correspondence between Ms. Sanchez and Mr. Menchel and/or Mr. Acosta from the period when the original agreement terms were reached. I was told that correspondence was produced that was not shown to

n' Subject: RE: I am thanks, and you?&nbs=; I've been in DC for the past month on a long federal trial. =hould end this coming week. <=p> As for Rothstein, we are =o longer involved. I met AJ the day the whole scandal broke. I should be in NY in mid•=uly - no the greatest time of year to be in Manhatta

From: Matthew I. Menchel Sent: Saturday, June 4, 2011 4:11 PM To: 'Jeffrey Epstein' Subject: RE: I am thanks, and you?&nbs=; I've been in DC for the past month on a lo

, they are my current bankers and would like this resolved , but would be able to pay more in an arbitration, ). 2. I have a lawsuit against one of Rothsteins partners < BRad Edwards, that is in florida, currently represented by lilys firm, but she is very preoccupied. ( facts may involve, how Marie is st

To: Jeffrey [email protected]] From: Matthew I. Menchel Sent Sun 10/31/2010 3:20:31 PM Subject RE: Are you free tomorrow afternoon to discuss these matters? I should be free anytime after noon. Matth

they are my current bankers and would like this resolved , but would be able to pay more in an arbitration, ). 2. I have a lawsuit against one of Rothsteins partners < BRad Edwards, that is in florida, currently represented by lilys firm, but she is very preoccupied. ( facts may involve, how Marie is s

To: Matthew I. Menchel From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Wed 11/3/2010 8:34:55 PM Subject Re: RE: Re: RE: on its way„ On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Matthew 1. Menchel wr

, they are my current bankers and would like this resolved , but would be able to pay more in an arbitration, ). 2. I have a lawsuit against one of Rothsteins partners < BRad Edwards, that is in florida, currently represented by lilys firm, but she is very preoccupied. ( facts may involve, how Marie is sti

From: "Matthew I. Menchel" < To: 'Jeevacation' <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Re: RE: Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 17:31:46 +0000 Man, you are a tough critic. This is emai