Epstein Secrets

A Ramiro Viratelt I 9 CARA L. HOLMES, ESQUIRE ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Tuesday, October, 20. 2009 40t

the State of Florida at Large, in the above cause. 6 0 And how did you get hired by Mr. Epstein? 7 - - 7 A Through an agency. 9 Thereupon, (LOUELLA RABUYO) 9 0 What agency? A It's Regal Domestics. 10 having been first duly sworn or affirmed, was examined 10 0 And what was your position that you

k. (Brief recess in proceedings.) MR. II may be obvious to us in the room, but it may not be apparent in the cold record that English is not Ms. Rabuyo's first language. So that's why I've interrupted a couple of times and asked her if she understands the question, 70 1 BY MR. EDWARDS: 2 0 Al

4 0 Was there a reason why you reported in the 5 afternoon? 6 A Ms. Maxwell called me. 7 Q When did she call you? A During that day, she sad Louella. you can 9 report in the afternoon. 10 0 She called you early in the morning? 11 A Not early. 12 0 Normally you would report to the house b

Rothstein falsely informed the investors that the potential settlement agreements were available for purchase. Plea Agreement at 2, United States v. Scott W. Rothstein, No. 9-60331-CR- 00HN (S.D. Fla. Jan. 27, 2010) attached hereto as Exhibit "SS." 87. It has been alleged that among other cases that Rothstein used

d on FI_SD Docket 01/1/2.215 Page 35 of Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1603b§ Filed 04/u44/11 Page 34 Ot 3V have run a giant Pont scheme at his law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler P.A. ("RRA"). This Ponzi scheme involved Rothstein falsely informing investors that settlement agreements had been reached wi

#16); See 20 EFTA00081201 Case 9:08-cv-8078gn3asiw 2a-c1.?60Verv iiecilif 4qp iRocistal..21c/M5 Page 23 of deposition of Epstein's housekeeper Louella Rabuyo, October 20, 2009, page 9, lines 17-25 (Deposition Attachment #I7); See deposition of Epstein's pilot Larry Eugene Morrison, October 6, 2009, page

3 of deposition of Epstein's housekeeper Louella Rabuyo, October 20, 2009, page 9, lines 17-25 (Depositi

ein. 3 MR. This lawsuit, the current one 4 Mr. Epstein is noticed for, and the lawsuit 5 in which Mr. Epstein has filed against the 6 former Rothstein, IIII and 7 Mr. is not proper for this 8 medium -- 9 MR. I understand your 10 position. 11 MR. -- in that regard, I'm going 12 to inst

n or 9 tell you what I'm talking about, Lowella Rabuyo; 10 you know who that is, right? 11 A Yes.

ther witnesses? 7 Q Yes, like I'll give you an example that 8 you may, just to refresh your recollection or 9 tell you what I'm talking about, Lowella Rabuyo; 10 you know who that is, right? 11 A Yes. 12 Q She is someone to works for you now, 13 she's a housekeeper. We took her deposition 14 al

oduction 188:11,14 192:18 173:3 174:19,20 217:15 189:10 ROSENFELDT 180:14,15 179:16 resign 191:7 133:9 184:1 182:3,4,14 186:3 192:25 ROTHSTEIN saying ESQUIRE u•Aleusin Gab•Compass Toll Free: 866.709.8777 Facsimile: 501.394.3621 Suite 600 4440 PGA Boulevard Palm Beach Gardens, FL 3341

204:6 164:10 p.m 135:1 217:1 reasonable 214:20 166:15 131:14 219:1 220:1 218:15 recovered 167:9 132:15 220:1 reasons 145:4 providing Rabuyo 209:24 213:7 recovering 168:15 131:11 214:14 144:12 169:20 question 132:12 recall reCIOAS 170:3 136:23 134:7 135:9 148:11,21 134:6 204:

6 32:7 risk 9:610:6,7 18:25 38:6 40:10 41:6,11 risks 21:5 Robert 2:1,8 4:2 6:3 role 25:13 37:7 Room 2:23 Rosenfeldt 1:17 rose-colored 11:16 Rothstein 1:17 FtPR-CM-RMR-F... 44:21 RPR-R111R-PCRFt... 2:21 rule 39:9 42:13 rules 22:3 25:1 34:24 40:15 42:13 ruling 8:25 42:7 runup 1931 23:8 25:2

was employed there. Specifically, he represented (Epst4in's number one co-conspirator who was actually named as such in the NPA), his housekeeper (Louella Ruboyo), his pilots Larry Morrison, Larry Visoski, David Rogers, William Hammond and Robert Roxburgh. (Hammond and Roxburgh were not deposed but the others

32:7 isk 9:6 10:6,7 18:25 38:6 40:10 41:6,11 risks 21:5 Robert 2:1,8 4:2 6:3 role 25:13 37:7 Room 2:23 Rosenfeld* 1:17 rose-colored 11:16 Rothstein 1:17 RPR-CM-RMR-F- 44:21 RPR-RMR-FCRR-. 2:21 rule 39:9 42:13 ules 22:3 25:1 3424 40:15 42:13 ruling 8:25 42:7 rulings 19:21 23:8 25:2 27:13

was employed there. Specifically, he represented (Epstein's number one co-conspirator who was actually named as such in the NPA), his housekeeper (Louella Ruboyo), his pilots Larry Morrison, Larry Visoski, David Rogers, William Hammond and Robert Roxburgh. (Hammond and Roxburgh were not deposed but the others

ment #16) See deposition of Epstein's housekeeper Louella Rabuyo, October 20, 2009, page 9, lines 17.25 (Depositio

CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, Vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant, / DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAIN

laint he carries forth the essence of all claims asserted in his original Complaint. In that pleading Epstein essentially alleges that Edwards joined Rothstein in the abusive prosecution of sexual assault cases against Epstein to “pump” the cases to Ponzi scheme investors. The purported “proof” of the allega

girls for him to abuse), Larry Visoski (Epstein’s personal pilot), Dave Rogers (Epstein’s personal pilot), Larry Harrison (Epstein’s personal pilot), Louella Rabuyo (Epstein’s housekeeper), Nadia Marcinkova (Epstein’s live-in sex slave), Ghislaine Maxwell (manager of Epstein’s affairs and businesses), Mark

ent #16); See deposition of Epstein's housekeeper Louella Rabuyo, October 20, 2009, page 9, lines 17-25 (Depositio

THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No.:50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants, STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS Defendant Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., offers the foll

Scott Rothstein appears to have mun a giant Ponzi scheme at his law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler P.A. (“RRA”). This Ponzi scheme involved Rothstein falsely informing investors that settlement agreements had been reached with putative defendants based upon claims of sexual harassment and/or wititl

Rothstein falsely informed the investors that the potential settlement agreements were available for purchase. Plea Agreement at 2, United States v. Scott W. Rothstein, No. 9-60331-CR-COHN (S.D. Fla. Jan. 27, 2010) attached hereto as Exhibit “SS.” 87. It has been alleged that among other cases that Rothstein used t

hat Larry Visoski, Larry Harrison, David Rogers, Louella Rabuyo, ME, Ghislaine Maxwell, Mark Epstein, and Janusz

at I had filed on behalf of my clients against Epstein and that it has been alleged that these lawsuits were used to fraudulently lure investors into Rothstein’s Ponzi scheme. I never met a single investor, had no part in any such presentations and had no knowledge any such fraud was occurring. If these alle

information to prove the cases against Jeffrey Epstein and accordingly I pursued them in discovery. In approximately November 2009, the existence of Scott Rothstein’s Ponzi scheme became public knowledge. It was at that time that I, along with many other reputable attorneys at RRA, first became aware of Rothstein c