Epstein Secrets

Razorback Funding, LLC, et at, v. Scott W. Rothstein, et at Complex Litigation Division - Case No.: 09-062943 (19) Third Amended Complaint By ignoring evidence of the Principal Conspirators' miscondu

Plaintiffs have discovered, relative to Levin, Preve, and Banyon, that: a. an $8,000,000.00 wire transfer confirmation used by Levin, Preve, and Rothstein to induce Razorback's $32,000,000.00 payment was never received by RRA or TD Bank. In fact, the fictitious $8,000,000.00 wire is powerful evidence

and has not been returned. Specific examples of Gibraltar Bank's overt acts, assistance and/or omissions in furtherance of the conspiracy include: a. Rothstein learned early in his scheme that he could not convince wealthy investors to give him money unless he established relationships with financial insti

sible. 321. Rothstein, through key Gibraltar Bank employees including Senior Vice President John Harris ("Harris") and Vice President Lisa Ellis ("Ellis"), leveraged his clout to cover persistent, sizeable account overdrafts and gained unfettered access to the transfer of money from RRA trust accoun

ALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO EDWARDS' RESPONSE IN OPP

ual allegations" in the underlying litigation. (Resp. at 2, quoting Corrected Second Amended Complaint at 2.) Edwards has EFTA00309488 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Div. AG Jeffrey Epstein's Reply to Edwards' Response misread the operative allegations of the Corrected

wered some questions, asserted the Fifth Amendment on others, and then properly sought relief as authorized by Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.310.4 See Tubero v. Ellis, 472 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 4ih DCA 1985) (holding that the trial court erred in finding appellant in contempt without ever ruling on the appellant's mot

e 13, 2013) CMA vs. JEE and Correspondence Summons and Complaint EE Summons and Complaint Motion, Notice and Order of Dismissal Rosenfeldt vs. Rothstein Doe 1 Case # 6596 Doe II Case # 20614 Document Production Doe II Case # 20614 Jane Doe 8 Case # 80802 Jane Doe 102 Case # 80656 CMA Case# 80811

and Jeffrey Epstein -Proxy Statement Relating to Transfer of Mngt to Fortress (DB Zwim Special Opportunities Fund, Ltd) May 5, 2009 -Kirkland and Ellis Invoices re Epstein vs. DB Zwirn -Harry's Summary Re Proposed Transaction btwn DBZCO & Fortress -Zwim Articles (WSJ and NY Post April 3, 2009) -An