Epstein Secrets

do that transaction on II against Brad Edward➢ accusing him of having been a II behalf of Jeffrey Epstein•a victims? 12 knowing participant in Scott Rothstein'➢ Rani 12 MR. LINK: Object to the form. 13 scheme -- 13 NITHESS: Nell, it was the right 14 MR. LINK: Object to the form. 14 thing to do.

e had reached the point where in 2008 you faced the economic reality of having to leave the bench. where did you than go? A I was hired by the Rothstein, Rosonfoldt a Adler firm. O How did that cone about? A As I said, I was interviewing with two firms. 10 There wore two largo firma that had

nd I think I met Spencer Kuvin. I just 7 believe the witness has finished his 7 can't place exactly where it wan. It wasn't at the 8 response. S Rothstein office. And I just don't -- it was somewhere 1 THE WITNESS: And wo keep talking about t in Went Palm Beach -- at a law firm in West Palm. 10 mo

r election Improprieties? A Yee. 9 MR. LINK: I change the question as I 1 Q How about your really good friend 10 go. I can do that. 10 Mr. Rosenfeld? 11 BY HR. LINK: II A Sams thing. 12 0 So, Mr. Borger -- 12 0 Same thing. 13 MR. SCAROLA: So as long as the record 13 So these are peopl

TEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF P

wsuit." This case has two components. First, Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein has a claim against Defendant Scott Rothstein for utilizing three cases that Rothstein's firm had against Epstein to fabricate other claims and continue the operation of a Ponzi scheme. Second, about whether Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein

re as follows: Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein claims that Defendant Scott Rothstein conspired with other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeld and Adler, for personal greed and enrichment, and engaged in a pattern of racketeering that involved, among other things, marketing of non-existent

KR. SCAROLA: May I now to this podium now? JEFFREY EPSTEIN, biaintirs/countor -Defendant, vs 4 THE CO1RT: Sure. 'at. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; • Your 110nOr, have we decided what notions were BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, , going to hoar? boranciants/countor -Plaintiffs

ng CO your Honor that 12 during a very CUTUICUOUSI period of CIAO these would I) the first notice we got of an Intent CO attempt. to to be the Rothstein fines, erployee. 14 use chose documents was March S. The first notice 14 KR. SMOLA: Yes, air. Let ne go through IS wo got of an intent CO attem

implosion of the Rothstein, 20 it docunonts, chat wore sent co us not covering all of the 724. And obviously, your Honor knows from the 2s , 31 Rosenfeld[, Adler urn a trustee was appointed by the bankruptcy court to take control of the firm, 22 materials that you have reviewed much attention was =

KR. SCAROLA: May I now to this podium now? JEFFREY EPSTEIN, biaintirs/countor -Defendant, vs 4 THE CWRT: Sure. 'at. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; • Your Honor, have we wowed what notions were BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, boranciants/countor -Plaintiffs. , 10 going to hoa

ng CO your Honor that 12 during a very CUTUICUOUSI period of CIAO these would I) the first notice we got of an Intent CO attempt. to to be the Rothstein fines, erployee. 14 use chose documents was March S. The first notice 14 KR. SMOLA: Yes, air. Let ne go through IS wo got of an intent CO attem

implosion of the Rothstein, 20 it docunonts, chat wore sent co us not covering all of the 724. And obviously, your Honor knows from the 2s , 31 Rosenfeld[, Adler urn a trustee was appointed by the bankruptcy court to take control of the firm, 22 materials that you have reviewed much attention was =

MAN Dora Raton Fort Lomat:Sale Worn, Tallahassee hi, EFTA00616223 MAR-15-2011 TUE 05:39 PM FAX NO. P. 03/07 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15711 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND F

and states: 1. First, jurisdiction over RRA rests in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of In Re: Rothstein, Rosenfeld and Adler, Case No. 09- 34791-BKC-RER. This Court has effectively recognized as much in a prior subpoena issued upon Mr. Stettin, RBA's T

1. First, jurisdiction over RRA rests in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of In Re: Rothstein, Rosenfeld and Adler, Case No. 09- 34791-BKC-RER. This Court has effectively recognized as much in a prior subpoena issued upon Mr. Stettin, RBA's Trustee. Mor

Rosenfeldt asked about sex parties South Florida Business Journal - by Paul Brinkmann Stuart Rosenfeldt, former law firm partner of Ponzi schemer Scott Rothstein, confronted questions Friday about the wild ways of key attorneys at the firm. Attorneys working on the bankruptcy of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler as

Fifth Amendment. Rosenfeldt's attorney, Bruce Lehr, said he knew of no factual basis for the allegations. Information also came out that suggested Rothstein pumped members of his former law firm to contribute money to firm coffers in unusual ways. "I want us all to be rich," Rothstein wrote in an e-mail

nfronted questions Friday about the wild ways of key attorneys at the firm. Attorneys working on the bankruptcy of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler asked Rosenfeld( if he was aware of "raucous sex-oriented parties," "a significant amount of womanizing," "drug use by RRA partners" and a paid trip to the Atlantis

se the EFTA00727749 correspondence in any CVRA case. The correspondence may also be relevant to a pending lawsuit that Epstein has filed against Rothstein, Rosenfeld, Adler and others currently pending before Judge Crow. The parties agree that Epstein will receive at least one week advance notice, in

00727749 correspondence in any CVRA case. The correspondence may also be relevant to a pending lawsuit that Epstein has filed against Rothstein, Rosenfeld, Adler and others currently pending before Judge Crow. The parties agree that Epstein will receive at least one week advance notice, in writing, of

t's test that answer. A Okay. Q Let's talk about Jane Doe 102, Jane Doe 7 102, , who was represented by 8 s firm, had nothing to do with 9 Rothstein, Rosenfeld, Adler. Do you know 10 A Who? 11 12 A Can you spell it? 13 Q Common spelling, like the 14 State -- 15 A Can you spell it fo

at answer. A Okay. Q Let's talk about Jane Doe 102, Jane Doe 7 102, , who was represented by 8 s firm, had nothing to do with 9 Rothstein, Rosenfeld, Adler. Do you know 10 A Who? 11 12 A Can you spell it? 13 Q Common spelling, like the 14 State -- 15 A Can you spell it for me, pleas

#004 740697 CMA vs. JEE and Correspondence Summons and Complaint JEE Summons and Complaint Motion, Notice and Order of Dismissal Rosenfeld( vs. Rothstein Doe 1 Case #6596 Doe II Case # 20614 Document Production Doe II Case # 20614 Jane Doe 8 Case # 80802 Jane Doe 102 Case # 80656 CMA Case# 80811

BINET ONE GR.M#004 740697 CMA vs. JEE and Correspondence Summons and Complaint JEE Summons and Complaint Motion, Notice and Order of Dismissal Rosenfeld( vs. Rothstein Doe 1 Case #6596 Doe II Case # 20614 Document Production Doe II Case # 20614 Jane Doe 8 Case # 80802 Jane Doe 102 Case # 80656 C

my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth 10 Amendment right under the U.S. Constitution, 11 therefore I'm going to do that. 12 Q Are you saying because Rothstein, 13 Rosenfeld, Adler was determined to be a criminal 14 enterprise or somebody was running a criminal 15 enterprise out of that law firm, that

and Fourteenth 10 Amendment right under the U.S. Constitution, 11 therefore I'm going to do that. 12 Q Are you saying because Rothstein, 13 Rosenfeld, Adler was determined to be a criminal 14 enterprise or somebody was running a criminal 15 enterprise out of that law firm, that is the 16 reas