Epstein Secrets

EFTA00792812 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: We are here on Epstein versus Rothstein and Edwards. The two applicable parties being dealt with -- have a seat, please. Thank you. -- being Mr. Epstein and Mr. Edwards, and the counter

ut of millions of dollars, claims of outrageous sums of money were made on behalf of alleged victims across the board, and the only way, in fact, Scott Rothstein sits in jail. And what I have read in the paper, claims that I settled cases for $200 million, which is totally not true. She has made claims of

an ancient action, malicious prosecution. But it is that very case that answers a point that Your Honor was just discussing. I'm talking about the Tatum Brothers case. And it says in Tatum Brothers -- THE COURT: Do you have a tab number for me? MS. ROCKENBACH: The tab number is -- I don't know th

protected by privacy rights 26570 08/13/2009 Scott Rothstein Marc Nurik Discussions about Epstein Work pro

ected by privacy rights 26570 08/13/2009 Scott Rothstein Marc Nurik Discussions about Epstein Work pro

, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 05995 04/01/2009 Bradley Edwards Carolyn Edwards Third party subpoenas for Tatum/Courtney Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence;

TEIN & liOROWIT2, P.A. BY: ADAI4HORownt ESQ. 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 la y , .,„ 6, and 7. ROTHSTEIN ROSENfELOT ADLER BY: BRAD J. EDWARDS, ESQ., and PODHURST ORSECK SQ. Attorney for lane Doe 101 and 102. Palm Bead, Gardens, Florida 33410 Attorn

of 20 ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ 21. 22 taken on behalf of the Plainbffs pursuant 23 to a Re-Notice of Taking Continued Videotaped 24 Depo9tlon (Duals Tatum) 25 - - - Page 2/3 Page 272 1 JANE DOE NO. Ii, CASE NO: 08-CV.80469 2 Plaintiff, 3 Vs. 4 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 5 Defendant. 6 JANE DOE NO