Epstein Secrets

FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and individually, Defendants. Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 Case No. 50 2009 CA 0

icial commentary in order to insure that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant EPSTEIN receives a fair trial. See State ex. rd. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976). Courts in Florida may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Shepnard v. - 2 - EFTA00616237 CAS

r litigants and the media are permissible for good cause shown in order to assure a fair trial. See State ex. rel. Miami I Jerald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). 7. The Florida Supreme Court

UIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA0408003OOC3CMBAG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. NOTICE OF HEARING- UMC PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned has set down for hear

. Ganetis; CHRISTOPHER E. KNIGHT; Lisa B. Toney; Lilly Ann Sanchez Jacqueline M. Borrero; Michelle S. Ganetis; Susan Aprill; Vicki Passy Epstein v. Rothstein - Signing and filing of NOH Epstein M/P/O Please see in directory 80743, our Notice of Hearing on Epstein's M/P/O from Making Extra-Judicial Statem

So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v, McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). 7. The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh recognized that restrictions on extra- judicial comment are within the power of the trial judge when it said: Limitation placed on lawyers, litigant

cial commentary in order to insure that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant EPSTEIN receives a fair trial. See Slide cx. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co, v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976). Cowls in Florida may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v - 2 - EFTA00599555 CASE

D FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. / DRAFT 4/26/11 PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTE

, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually

ves a fair trial. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); State ex. reL Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); Sentinel Commc'n Co. v. Watson, 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limitations imposed by a court on co

impediment to a court prohibiting counsel from making prejudicial statements that are intended for publication). 13. The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh, 340 So. 2d at 910, recognized that restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of the trial judge: Limitation placed on lawyers, li

D FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, ead-laiadividually3 Defendants. DRAFT 4/26/11 PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S

, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individu

es a fair trial. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); Sentinel Commc'n - 4 - FOIVLER WHITE BURNER P.A. • ESPIRITO SANTO PLAZA, 1395 BRICKELL AVENUE, 14u , FLOOR. MIAM

impediment to a court prohibiting counsel from making prejudicial statements that are intended for publication). 13. The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh, 340 So. 2d at 910, recognized that restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of the trial judge: Limitation placed on lawyers, li

AIL Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Re: Espstein v. Rothstein, et al Our File No.: 80743 Espirito Santo Plaza Fourteenth Floor 1395 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 www.fowler.white.corn Christopher E

nd lawyers and/or litigants are permissible for good cause shown in order to assure a fair trial. See State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supreme Court in

340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh recognized that restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of the trial judge when it said: Limitation placed on lawyers, litigants

AIL Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Re: Espstein v. Rothstein, et al Our File No.: 80743 Espirito Santo Plaza Fourteenth Floor 1395 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 www.fowler•white.com Christopher E.

nd lawyers and/or litigants are permissible for good cause shown in order to assure a fair trial. See State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supreme Court in

340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh recognized that restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of the trial judge when it said: Limitation placed on lawyers, litigants

of EFTA00226963 evidence (Reply to Response of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler P.A.'s ) filed by Jeffrey Epstei

tachments: # 1 Exhibit Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Civil Rico Case Statement Pursuant to Local Rule 12.1. and Proposed Order) (McIntosh. Douglas) (Entered: 08/29/2008) 09/04/2008 19 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 1 Notice of Removal Amended Complaint by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses du

561)842-2820 Fax: (561)515-3148 Attorney to be Noticed Email: [email protected] Haley Robson Defendant Doualas Malcolm McIntosh Lead Attorney McIntosh Sawran Peltz Cartaya & Petruccelli 1776 E Sunrise Boulevard PO Box 7990 Fort Lauderdale , FL 33338-7990 USA Phone: (954)765-1001 Fax: 765-1005

32:7 risk 9:6 10:6,7 18:25 38:6 40:10 41:6,11 risks 21:5 Robert 2:1,8 4:2 6:3 role 25:13 37:7 Room 2:23 Rosenfeldt 1:17 rose-colored 11:16 Rothstein 1:17 RPR-CM-RMR-F... 44:21 RPR-RMR-FCRR... 2:21 rule 39:9 42:13 rules 22:3 25:134:24 40:15 42:13 ruling 8:25 42:7 rulings 192123:8 25:2 27:

Blvd., Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Fax: 561 697 2383 Counsel for Plaintiffiane Doe Douglas M. McIntosh, Esq. Jason A. McGrath, Esq. McIntosh, Sawran, Peltz & Cartaya, P.A. Centurion Tower 1601 Forum Place, Suite 1110 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Fax. 561 682-3206 Counsel for Defenda

reviewed 4:21 revisit 13:1 right 6:25 7:24 9:7,13 11:1 11:3,14 12:8,9 13:11,22 15:6,19 rights 12:16 Robert 2:6 4:5 Rosenfeldt 2:12 Rothstein 2:12 rule 5:25 6:3,4 6:24 8:13 8:18 9:17 9:18 11:21 13:10 14:5 14:5 ruled 7:15 Rules 5:21 6:1 11:22 ruling 8:7,22 8 3:1 4:7 6:2 say

can exercise his discretion in determining the destiny and security of himself, other people, and the Nation." Stew ex rel. Miami Herald Pub. Co.l McIntosh, 340 So.2d 904, 908 (Fla.1977). In serving the right of each cit- Page 2 izen to be informed, judicial openness, of which the press is an instrume

16 32:7 risk 9:6 10:6,7 18:25 38:6 40:1041:6,11 risks 21:5 Robert 2:1,8 4:2 6:3 role 25:1317:7 Room 2:23 Rosenfeldt 1:17 rose-colored 11:16 Rothstein 1:17 HPR-CM-RNIR-F... 44:21 RPR-RMR-FCRR... 2:21 rule 39:9 42:13 rules 22:3 25:1 34:24 40:15 42:13 ruling 8:25 42:7 rulings 19:21 23:8 25:2

e press have a fundamental right of access to all judicial proceedings," however, this right is not absolute. State ex rel. Miami Herald Pub. Co. McIntosh, 340 So.2d at 908-9. In Bar- ron, the court took the occasion to establish the standards upon which the presumption of openness may be overcome whe