Epstein Secrets

14 PM IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO OUASH SUBPOENA AND FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PREVENT DEPOSITI

F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individual

surprise, to encourage the settlement of cases, to avoid costly litigation, and to achieve a balanced search for the truth to ensure a fair trial." Elkins v. Syken, 672 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 1996) (citing Dodson v. Pend!, 390 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 1980); Suif Drugs, Inc. v. Vermette, 236 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 1970))

d 517 (Fla. 1996) (citing Dodson v. Pend!, 390 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 1980); Suif Drugs, Inc. v. Vermette, 236 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 1970)). -"S ,r‘ II. In Elkins, the Florida Supreme Court commented on the purpose of pretrial discovery: Discovery was never intended to be used as a tactical tool to harass an

16 32:7 risk 9:6 10:6,7 18:25 38:640:1041:6,11 risks 21:5 Robert 2:1,8 4:2 6:3 role 25:13 37:7 Room 2:23 Rosenfeldt 1:17 rase-colored 11:16 Rothstein 1:17 RPR-CM-RMR-F... 44:21 RPR-RMR-FCRR... /:/1 rule 39:9 42:13 rules 22:3 25:1 34:24 40:15 42:13 ruling 8:25 42:7 rulings 19:21 23:8 25:2

East 1:17 2:15 1:16 3:7.7 5:16,20,23 42:22 42:22 effect 9:7 17:5 efforts 41:10 either 9:3 10:5 30:20 40:3,25 elected 29:22 eligible 31:20 Elkins 1:20 email 44:24 embarrassment 32:3 enforce 21:17 25:17 enforcement 7:2 enforcing 25:10 enter 40:20 entered 33:12 40:19 entire 5:15 20:25 36

illiam 3. Berger, Esq. Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East las Olas Boulevard., S

, pursuant 0.065 Florida Statutes. Contact your local FDLE office if you have questions regarding this law. I would likt Sincerely, • ....ajtdice Elkins If u were on supervision for a sexual offense, attached is a copy of the Notice of Responsibilities, which outlines your continued responsibilities

show 36:22 42:11 22:10,19 29:9 39:4 T44:17,17 times 17:19 18:2 rose-colored 11:16 Sid 3:10 44:5,22 take 7:12 9:12 10:3,3 today 8:4 13:11 14:3 Rothstein 1:17 side 7:17,17 State's 27:16 10:12,13,21 11:12 14:6,6 15:5 28:17 RPR-CM-RMR-F... sideline 8:9 statute 17:4 18:3 11:18,21,22 14:7 31:9,19 3

t 1:17 2:15 Edwards 1:16 3:7,7 5:16,20,23 4222 4222 effect 9:7 17:5 efforts 41:10 either 9:3 10:5 30:20 40:3,25 elected 2922 eligible 31:20 Elkins 1:20 email 44:24 embarrassment 32:3 enforce 21:17 25:17 enforcement 72 enforcing 25:10 enter 40:20 entered 33:12 40:19 entire 5:15 20:25 36:

:17 show 3622 42:11 22:10,1929:939:4 '144:17,17 dma 17:19 18:2 rose-colored 11:16 Sid 3:10 44:5,22 take 7:12 9:12 10:3,3 today 8:4 13:11 14:3 Rothstein 1:17 side 7:17,17 Suttee 27:16 10:12.13.21 11:12 14:6,6 15:5 28:17 RPR-CM•RMR-F... sideline 8:9 statute 17:4 18:3 11:18,21,2214:7 31:9,19 352

7 elected 29:22 25:16 29:21 30:1 20:20 31:19 cut 1614 fleshed 20:12 eligible 31:20 36:3 38:22 copy 284 36:13 C.M.A 1:24 3:14 determine 9:8 Elkins 1:20 client's 29:3 41:25 42:6 17:1624:11 26:10 developed 32:11 email 4414 dad 9:14 correct 5:12 23:1 26:15 40:11 difference 36:13 embarrass

32:7 risk 9:6 10:6,7 18:25 38:6 40:10 41:6,11 risks 21:5 Robert 2:1,8 4:2 6:3 role 25:13 37:7 Room 2:23 Rosenfeldt 1:17 rose-colored 11:16 Rothstein 1:17 RPR-CM-RMR-F... 44:21 RPR-RMR-FCRR... 2:21 rule 39:9 42:13 rules 22:3 25:134:24 40:15 42:13 ruling 8:25 42:7 rulings 192123:8 25:2 27:

1:17 2:15 Edwards 1:16 3:7,7 5:16,20,23 42:22 42:22 effect 9:7 17:5 efforts 41:10 either 9:3 10:5 30:20 403,25 elected 2922 eligible 31:20 Elkins 1:20 email 44:24 embarrassment 32:3 enforce 21:1725:17 enforcement 7:2 enforcing 25:10 enter 40:20 entered 33:12 40:19 entire 5:15 20:25 36:

32:7 risk 9:6 10:6,7 18:25 38:6 40;10 41:6,11 risks 21:5 Robert 2:1,8 4:2 6:3 role 25:13 37:7 Room 2:23 Rosenfeldt 1;17 rose-colored 11:16 Rothstein 1:17 RPR-CM-RMR-F... 44:21 RPR-RMR-FCRR... 2:21 rule 39:9 42:13 rules 22:3 25:1 34:24 40:15 42:13 ruling 8:25 42:7 rulings 19:21 23:8 25:2

1:17 2:15 Edwards 1:163:7,7 5:16,20,23 42:22 42:22 effect 9:7 17:5 efforts 41:10 either 9:3 10:5 30:20 40:3,25 elected 29:22 eligible 31:20 Elkins 1:20 email 44:24 embarrassment 32:3 enforce 21:17 25:17 enforcement 7:2 enforcing 25:10 enter 40:20 entered 33:12 4ff 19 entire 5:15 20:25 3

6 32:7 risk 9:610:6,7 18:25 38:6 40:10 41:6,11 risks 21:5 Robert 2:1,8 4:2 6:3 role 25:13 37:7 Room 2:23 Rosenfeldt 1:17 rose-colored 11:16 Rothstein 1:17 FtPR-CM-RMR-F... 44:21 RPR-R111R-PCRFt... 2:21 rule 39:9 42:13 rules 22:3 25:1 34:24 40:15 42:13 ruling 8:25 42:7 runup 1931 23:8 25:2

elected 2922 25:16 29:21 30:1 20:20 31:19 cut 16:24 desired 20:12 eligible 31:20 36:3 38:22 copy 28:4 36:13 C.M.A 1:24 3:14 determine 9:8 Elkins 1:20 client's 29:3 41:25 42:6 17:16 24:1126:10 developed 32:11 email 44:24 cloud 9:14 correct 5:12 23:1 26:15 40:11 difference 36:13 embarr

32:7 isk 9:6 10:6,7 18:25 38:6 40:10 41:6,11 risks 21:5 Robert 2:1,8 4:2 6:3 role 25:13 37:7 Room 2:23 Rosenfeld* 1:17 rose-colored 11:16 Rothstein 1:17 RPR-CM-RMR-F- 44:21 RPR-RMR-FCRR-. 2:21 rule 39:9 42:13 ules 22:3 25:1 3424 40:15 42:13 ruling 8:25 42:7 rulings 19:21 23:8 25:2 27:13

t 22:5 38:17 elected 29:22 25:16 29:2130:1 36:3 3822 2020 31:19 copy28:4 36:13 M5:24 1:24 3:14 desired 20:12 determine 9:8 eligible 31:20 Elkins 1:20 client's 29:3 41:25 42:6 17:16 24:1126:10 developed 32:11 email 44:24 cloud 9:14 cornet 5:12 23:1 26:15 40:11 difference 36:13 embarra

ley J. Edwards, Esq. and William J. Berger, Esq., Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, 4 day of July, 2009. 26 on

1:17 2:15 Edwards 1:16 3:7,7 5:16,20,23 42:22 42:22 effect 9:7 17:5 efforts 41:10 either 9:3 10:5 30:20 40:3,25 elected 2922 eligible 31:20 Elkins 1:20 email 44:24 embarrassment 32:3 enforce 21:17 25:17 enforcement 7:2 enfordng 25:10 enter 40:20 entered 33: 12 40:19 entire 5:15 20:25 36