Epstein Secrets

ximum number of non-treatment drug tests, *1220 thereby impermissibly delegating that authort to Torres' probation officer. See United States Stephens, 424 F.3d 876, 881 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that "a probation officer may not decide the ... extent of the punishment imposed," because " [u]nder o

bmit, the court erred when it failed to state the maximum number of non-treatment drug tests the probation officer could impose"). Unlike in Stephens, where the district court expressly delegated the authority to set a maximum number of non-treatment drug tests to the probation officer, id at 87

ge 3 rights. The granting of a declaratory judgment, however, is a matter resting in the sound discreti of the court (Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. Quarles, 4 Cir., 92 F.2d 321); and it is clear thattGe discretion ought not be exercised in a case of this character where its only effect would be to deci

r James B. Comey, former senior White House aide Stephen K. Bannon, former campaign chairman Paul Manafort

struck last month for testimony from Mr. Mueller, the former special counsel, and the two prosecutors could still unravel. Both Mr. Zebley and Mr. Quarles have left the Justice Department and are now private citizens, meaning that the department most likely cannot actually block their testimony. But t

r James B. Comey, former senior White House aide Stephen K. Bannon, former campaign chairman Paul Manafor

struck last month for testimony from Mr. Mueller, the former special counsel, and the two prosecutors could still unravel. Both Mr. Zebley and Mr. Quarles have left the Justice Department and are now private citizens, meaning that the department most likely Page 12539 EFTA00043050 cannot actually b