Epstein Secrets

Stock Ownership Plan Committee, Kathleen Cavallo, Stephen Lacoff, Robert 10 of 25 12/18/09 12:16 PM EFTA

the mandamus petition is DENIED because Petitioner has not demonstrated that he lacks an adequate, alternative means of obtaining relief. See In re von Bulow, 828 F.2d 94, 98 (2d Cir. 1987). Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA. Issued As Mandate: 11/13/2009. (nd) (Entered: 11/16/2009) 11/16/2009 Transm

mines the ap- plicable clergy privilege."), 2 Stephen A. Saltzburg, Michael M. Martin & Daniel J. Capr

n there are federal law claims in a case also presenting state law claims, the fed- eral rule favoring admissibility ...I the controlling rule."); von Bulow von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 141 ( d Cir.I987) (holding that federal law controlled question of privilege where federal civil RICO claims were jo

. *19 William F. Lee with whom Robert D. Keefe, Stephen A. Jonas, Mark D. Selwyn, Hale and Don LLP, Rich

crystal clear that any previously privileged inform- ation actually revealed during the call lost any eneer of privilege. See, e.g., von Bu- low . von Bulow (In re von Bulow), 828 F.2d 4, 102-03 (2d Cir.1987); In re Sealed Case, 676 F.2d 793, 817-18 (D.C.Cir.1982). XYZ does not contest the occurre