Epstein Secrets

From: "Stephen Caplinger" <I To: "'Gary Kemey"' Cc: <1 >, "'

ferent. • Gensler has not specified the roof yet and I am not entirely sure theirs will be equivalent, the one specified in this budget is based on the Office Pavilion, which in my opinion was over designed. • The paint finish is a simple in house job and does not account for a Pinto or designer look. No paint in

l.com> Sent: Friday, June 5, 2009 9:31 PM To: Stephen Caplinger Subject: Fwd: Revised Master Budget

erent. • Gensler has not specified the roof yet and I a= not entirely sure theirs will be equivalent, the one specified in this bu=get is based on the Office Pavilion, which in my opinion was over designed= • The paint finish is a simple in house job and =oes not account for a Pinto or designer look. No paint in

ater. Please call me if you have any comments or questions and I look forward to seeing you. St hen M. Ca linger EFTA_R1_00195272 EFTA01821922 Ste hen M. Ca linger The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information

Dec 26, 2009 at 8:45 AM Subject: LSJ Jeffrey: It greatly concerns me that you are disappointed so I wanted to address your concerns. In regard to the Office Pavilion entry landscaaping, We proceeded to construction only because we felt that we had you approval. I felt that we had your approval and go ahead after

he CZM submittal can be revised later. Please call me if you have any comments or questions and I look forward to seeing you. Ste hen M. Ca lin er Ste hen M. Ca lin er EFTA_R1_01504182 EFTA02433036

Dec 26, 2009 at 8:45 AM Subject: LSJ Jeffrey: It greatly concerns me that you are disappointed so 1 wanted to address your concerns. In regard to the Office Pavilion entry landscaaping, We proceeded to construction only because we felt that we had you approval. I felt that we had your approval and go ahead after