Epstein Secrets

ximum number of non-treatment drug tests, *1220 thereby impermissibly delegating that authort to Torres' probation officer. See United States Stephens, 424 F.3d 876, 881 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that "a probation officer may not decide the ... extent of the punishment imposed," because " [u]nder o

bmit, the court erred when it failed to state the maximum number of non-treatment drug tests the probation officer could impose"). Unlike in Stephens, where the district court expressly delegated the authority to set a maximum number of non-treatment drug tests to the probation officer, id at 87

ffs, the defendant appeals. Reversed. West Headnotes 111 Courts 106 €508(7) 106 Courts 106VII Concurrent and Conflicting Jurisdiction 106VII(B) State Courts and United States Courts 1061(508 Injunction by United States Court Against Proceedings in State Court 106k508(2) Restraining Particular Proce

A00100214 LISA C. HAY Federal Public Defender STEPHEN R. SADY Chief Deputy Defender Gerald M. Needham

consistent not only with the transparency directives in the FSA," but also with the advice of leading organizations such as the National Center for State Courts which recommends that independent evaluators determine whether their independent "research findings support or contradict conclusions drawn by the i

A00064951 LISA C. HAY Federal Public Defender STEPHEN R. SADY Chief Deputy Defender Gerald M. Needham

consistent not only with the transparency directives in the FSA," but also with the advice of leading organizations such as the National Center for State Courts which recommends that independent evaluators determine whether their independent "research findings support or contradict conclusions drawn by the i

A00094069 LISA C. HAY Federal Public Defender STEPHEN R. SADY Chief Deputy Defender Gerald M. Needham

consistent not only with the transparency directives in the FSA," but also with the advice of leading organizations such as the National Center for State Courts which recommends that independent evaluators determine whether their independent "research findings support or contradict conclusions drawn by the i