Epstein Secrets

ximum number of non-treatment drug tests, *1220 thereby impermissibly delegating that authort to Torres' probation officer. See United States Stephens, 424 F.3d 876, 881 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that "a probation officer may not decide the ... extent of the punishment imposed," because " [u]nder o

bmit, the court erred when it failed to state the maximum number of non-treatment drug tests the probation officer could impose"). Unlike in Stephens, where the district court expressly delegated the authority to set a maximum number of non-treatment drug tests to the probation officer, id at 87

. 12/27/2007 EFTA00191920 Page 8 of 16 259 F. 525 Page 8 259 F. 525, 170 C.C.A. 487 (Cite as: 259 F. 525) proceedings must be identical. In Maitland's Equity (page 261) that distinguished legal scholar says: 'A civil court, again, must not prohibit a man from instituting criminal proceedings.'

Lazarusl" "Leonard Padilla" Telega (E-mail)" , "Susan Potts" , "Sue Rott , "Sue Rotto" , "Sue Rotto" , "Steve Warshawer" "Steve Maynard' , "STEPHEN "Stan Jones" IMIII~11. ffi r imvn R.eiersaard , "Sharon Lombardi" "SCOTT SENSANBAUGHER" , "Scott Sanger" "Sandra Stokes" , "Rust Tambascio "Rudy

rhoff' <~~>, "Larry , "Larry Webb" cS, "Lally Gates" "Kirk Bemis'"Kim Hamann" , "Mark , "Maria EFTA00580704 Goulard" Miller" Anderson" < Maitland" Caine" "Jack Witlin" Robinson" Vigil" Goedhart" Richards" Treude" Stearley" Mc uillan Seli "Kibler. Vir inia" < "Kerry ,"Ken Shuey" "K

mines the ap- plicable clergy privilege."), 2 Stephen A. Saltzburg, Michael M. Martin & Daniel J. Capr

thority, and effectuate its decrees without extending its jurisdic- tion. Keith Jeffrey Lambdin, Katzman Gar- finkel Rosenbaum, John David Mallah, Maitland, FL, for Plaintiff. Bradley Ryan Weiss, Benson Mucci & Associates LLP, Thomas E. Tookey, Coral Springs, FL, Brian E. Sims, Michael D. Prough, Wil