Epstein Secrets

2001) (“The Supreme Court has recognized that the First Amendment offers protection to both speakers and those wishing to receive speech.”); see also Stephens v. Cnty. of Albemarle, VA, 524 F.3d 485, 492 (4th Cir. 2008) (providing that a plaintiff has “standing to assert a right to receive speech” by “show[

gs because of the exceptional public interest in this case and the compelling circumstances supporting transparency rather than continued secrecy. 1. The Grand Jury is Under the Court’s Supervision and Jurisdiction. 92. It is well-settled that the grand jury is ‘“a judicial proceeding in a court of justice . . an

Holdings, LLC, Publisher of The Palm Beach Post Stephen A. Mendelsohn, Esq. 5100 Town Center Circle, Sui

019-CA-014681-AG ORDER ON THE GRAND JURY TESTIMONY REGARDING JEFFERY EPSTEIN The Court was tasked with determining whether the release of the Grand Jury records would further justice. For different reasons, the Court reaches the same conclusion as the two predecessor judges who also denied the requ

claims, but does not prove, that he has hired Dr. Stephen Alexander as an expert witness in this case. He

nt or is a foregone conclusion. See, e.g. In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Oct. 29, 1992, 1 F.3d