Epstein Secrets

sephsberg for this assignment. In fact, when I told you of Judge Davis’s selection during our meeting last Wednesday, November 21°, you and Professor Dershowitz seemed very comfortable, and certainly not surprised, with the selection. Podhurst and Josephsberg are no strangers to nearly the entire Epstein defe

serve this function. After all, Mr. Epstein is also represented by Dean Kenneth Starr, Martin Weinberg, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz, Lily Ann Sanchez, and Guy Lewis. That being said, the Southern District of Florida will only renew the offer to extend the current deadline if you

our meeting last Wednesday, November 21°, you and Professor Dershowitz seemed very comfortable, and certainly not surpri

rg, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz, Lily Ann Sanchez, and Guy Lewis. Tha

d that we use retired llth Circuit Judge Joseph Hatchett instead of Judge Davis because of Judge Davis's heaith problems. (No one has contacted Judge Hatchett yet, but one of the District Judges in Miami mentioned him as a good choice.) I am available for a conference call between 9:00 and 10:00, and betwe

istrict Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. k)Idberger aewpa.com Robert D.

n direct evidence, and, in some cases is even more reliable.'" United States v. Ranum, 96 F.3d 1020, 1026 (7th Cir. 1996) (quoting United States v. Hatchett, 31 F.3d 1411, 1421 (7th Cir. 1994)). For all these reasons, the Court should conclude that Epstein is fraudulently transferring assets. 11 EFTA

ens armies 4 BE, Responses is Pnumersied Wiens 24 Bii06 crccsssceces zamsammmsnccmsemernsemmmeacesnnsacenem 6 1. Stories and allegations concerning Dershowitz, foreign presidents, and world leaders are highly relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 1) .0...... ce ceeeeseeeseeeseeeseeeseeeneeesees 6 2. Me

7, 1998)... 25 United States v. Dukes, 727 F.2d 34, 37 (2d Cir. 1984) oo. ceiceeccssseeseceseesseeeseesseeeeecseessaeeseeesneeees 17 United States v. Hatchett, 918 F.2d 631, 641 (6th Cir, 1990) oo. eee ceeeesseeseeeseeeseeeseesseeeseeenaeeees 22 United States v. Lujan, No. 05—CR-924 (RB) (D.N.M. Mar. 25, 20

esponses to Enumerated Motions 11 Limine ......ccccccccccccccceceteces cece cessecnseceseseenssssseensensees 6 1. Stories and allegations concerning Dershowitz, foreign presidents, and world leaders are highly relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 1) ..00...0.. eee eceeeeeeeeeeeeeeteeneene 6 2. Meeting

7, 1998)... 25 United States v. Dukes, 727 F.2d 34, 37 (2d Cir. 1984) o.oo ccecccecccccccceccceesccessscssseecneeeesstecsseeenees 17 United States v. Hatchett, 918 F.2d 631, 641 (6th Cir. 1990) oo... cccccc cee ceececeeeeeseeessesenees 22 United States v. Lujan, No. 05—CR—-924 (RB) (D.N.M. Mar. 25, 2011) ..