Epstein Secrets

141,013 Fwd: Statement for Press From: Carolyn Cohen Date: February 10, 2015 at 10:40:57 AM EST To: Alan Dershowitz Subject: Statement for Press Alan Dershowitz's Statement: We can now prove that Jane Doe #3 has no credibility and lied about Clinton, the Gores and Dershowitz. Dershowitz's lawyers have filed

bject: Statement for Press Alan Dershowitz's Statement: We can now prove that Jane Doe #3 has no credibility and lied about Clinton, the Gores and Dershowitz. Dershowitz's lawyers have filed a detailed reply to Jane Doe #3 false charges. In it they definitively respond to all of the alleged evidence pres

n Date: February 10, 2015 at 10:40:57 AM EST To: Alan Dershowitz Subject: Statement for Press Alan Der

est details designed to enhance the value of her fictional account: "[Jane Doe #3) disclosed that Mr Clinton's vice-president Al Gore and his wife, Tipper, were also guests of Epstein on his island...'I had no clue that anything was up,' [Jane Doe #3] says. 'The Gores seemed like a beautiful couple wh

other meeting with a powerful political figure for the British tabloid, this time claiming to have met former Vice President Gore and his then wife, Tipper, on the same Island, again providing no specific dates or times, but only personal interest details designed to enhance the value of her fictional

ence of any kind showint him with vr 99'79 On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Martin G. Weinberg < > wrote: I have just finished a lengthy call with Alan. All his lawyers and Man believe it is deeply helpful for him to challenge VR on the tape issue. I informed him of the risks to you, down the road,

m> wrote: EFTA00864871 From: Carolyn Cohen Date: February 9, 2015 at 3:11:39 PM EST To: Alan Dershowitz ‹ > Subject: Alan Dershowitz Statement Alan Dershowitz's Statement: We can categorically prove that Jane Doe #3 allegations deserves no credibility whatsoever . Her wild fabrications are now clearly dispr

se charges. In it they have definitively responded to all of the so called evidence presented by Jane Doe #3 and her lawyers. Since that filing Mr. Dershowitz's lawyers have uncovered incontroverible evidence that Jane Doe #3 has repeatedly lied about her fabricated contacts with former President Clinton

ther meeting with a powerful political figure for the British tabloid, this time claiming to have met former Vice President Gore and his then wife, Tipper, on the same Island, again providing no specific dates or times, but only personal interest details designed to enhance the value of her fictional a

frey E." <[email protected]> To: "Martin G. Weinberg" Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:33:25 +0000 she put in alan, why not clinton. ? I am certain i am not crazy On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Martin G. Weinberg < > wrote: My concern is that he forces himself

[email protected]> wrote: From: Carolyn Cohen Date: February 9, 2015 at 3:11:39 PM EST To: Alan Dershowitz < ) Subject: Alan Dershowitz Statement Alan Dershowitz's Statement We can categorically prove that Jane Doe #3 allegations deserves no credibility whatsoever . Her wild fabrications are now clearly dispro

se charges. In it they have definitively responded to all of the so called evidence presented by Jane Doe #3 and her lawyers. Since that filing Mr. Dershowitz's lawyers have uncovered incontroverible evidence that Jane Doe #3 has repeatedly lied about her fabricated contacts with former President Clinton

ther meeting with a powerful political figure for the British tabloid, this time claiming to have met former Vice President Gore and his then wife, Tipper, on the same Island, again providing no specific dates or times, but only personal interest details designed to enhance the value of her fictional a

e that's at issue in this case, our client said, "Now her 6 story has grown and evolved, and she's included allegations 7 about world leaders and Alan Dershowitz, which he denies." We 8 can't just take that part out of her statement, that's what 9 Ms. Maxwell put in her statement. 10 And your Honor, what

at statement, 6 so there's no substantive evidence on that point that would be 7 coming in. 8 And the third category is with respect to 9 Mr. Dershowitz, who is on the defendant's witness list for 10 trial, and we have a few points there to raise. I mean, one is 11 obviously that if that were allo

included allegations 7 about world leaders and Alan Dershowitz, which he denies." We 8 can't just t

ut Bill 13 Clinton being on the island and says, "He was never there." 14 Right after that, she says, n discussed that Al Gore 15 and his wife Tipper were also guests on the island." And 16 Ms. Maxwell writes, "They have also never been on the island, 17 and I don't believe they even know Jeffr

he one that's at issue in this case, our client said, "Now her story has grown and evolved, and she's included allegations about world leaders and Alan Dershowitz, which he denies." We can't just take that part out of her statement, that's what Ms. Maxwell put in her statement. And your Honor, what we will u

at statement, 6 so there's no substantive evidence on that point that would be 7 coming in. 8 And the third category is with respect to 9 Mr. Dershowitz, who is on the defendant's witness list for 10 trial, and we have a few points there to raise. I mean, one is 11 obviously that if that were allo

arate lawsuit that's spun out of this situation where Cassell and Edwards filed a defamation action in Florida State Court against Alan Dershowitz. Alan. Dershowitz then counterclaimed. That was litigated in Florida State Court for about a year. Ultimately, the parties settled their differences in

e claims about Bill Clinton being on the island and says, "He was never there." Right after that, she says, " discussed that Al Gore and his wife Tipper were also guests on the island." And Ms. Maxwell writes, "They have also never been on the island, and I don't believe they even know Jeffrey Epste

arate lawsuit that's spun out of this situation where Cassell and Edwards filed a defamation action in Florida State Court against Alan Dershowitz. Alan Dershowitz then counterclaimed. That was litigated in Florida State Court for about a year. Ultimately, the parties settled their differences in an undisclose

ere to make that statement, so there's no substantive evidence on that point that would be coming in. And the third category is with respect to Mr. Dershowitz, who is on the defendant's witness list for trial, and we have a few points there to raise. I mean, one is obviously that if that were allowed to c

e's included allegations about world leaders and Alan Dershowitz, which he denies." We can't just take

ms about Bill Clinton being on the island and says, "He was never there." Right after that, she says, "Virginia discussed that Al Gore and his wife Tipper were also guests on the island." And Ms. Maxwell writes, "They have also never been on the island, and I don't believe they even know Jeffrey Epste

Wc: 839 Dershowitz: We can now prove that Jane Doe #3 lied about Clinton, Gore and Dershowitz Alan Dershowitz's lawyers have now filed a detailed reply to Jane Doe #3

Wc: 839 Dershowitz: We can now prove that Jane Doe #3 lied about Clinton, Gore and Dershowitz Alan Dershowitz's lawyers have now filed a detailed reply to Jane Doe #3 false charges. In it they definitively respond to all of the alleged evidence presented by Ja

Doe #3 lied about Clinton, Gore and Dershowitz Alan Dershowitz's lawyers have now filed a detailed re

th a powerful political figure for the British tabloid, this time claiming to have met former Vice President Gore and his then EFTA00582897 wife, Tipper, on the same Island, again providing no specific dates or times, but only personal interest details designed to enhance the value of her fictional a

did Bill commute Prosperi’s sentence as some kind of favour for Epstein?’ Virginia disclosed that Mr Clinton’s vice- president Al Gore and his wife, Tipper, were also guests of Epstein on his island. © AFP/Getty Images Guests: Virginia says she also met former Vice President Al Gore, pictured right wit

stake In Filing Sexual Misconduct Charges Against Professor Dershowitz Professor Alan M. Dershowitz released the follow

impson, [email protected] April 8, 2016 Lawyers Acknowledge Mistake In Filing Sexual Misconduct Charges Against Professor Dershowitz Professor Alan M. Dershowitz released the following statement regarding resolution of the case styled Bradley Edwards, et al. v. Alan M. Dershowitz, Case No. CACE 15-000072 (Cir.

he Court has taken it upon itself to strike the impertinent factual details from the Rule 21 Motion and related filings, the Court concludes that Mr. Derschowitz’s intervention in this case is unnecessary. Accordingly, his motion to intervene will be denied as moot.’ Regarding whether a show cause order shoul

/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, VS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. / REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LIMITED INTERVENTION BY ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ Alan M. Dershowitz hereby replies in support of his Motion for Limited Intervention (DE 282). Prof. Dershowitz’s only interest in joining this case

N FOR LIMITED INTERVENTION BY ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ Alan M. Dershowitz hereby replies in support of his Motion for Limited Intervention (DE 282). Prof. Dershowitz’s only interest in joining this case is to strike the false, sensational and irrelevant allegations against him. In its response (DE 290), the govern

is British newspaper an account of yet another fictional meeting on the same island, but this time with former vice president Gore and his then wife, Tipper, providing specific details purportedly to enhance the value of her fictional story: “The Gores seemed like a beautiful couple when I met them... Jef

did Bill commute Prosperi’s sentence as some kind of favour for Epstein?’ Virginia disclosed that Mr Clinton’s vice-president Al Gore and his wife, Tipper, were also guests of Epstein on his island. Case 1:15! GrO Tash VES 0 Dercerrne rit 2 Hb Bicokz pings SEMI] OMe Grind 5 Cambridge can't contain her

1 Motion and related filings should be stricken from the record. Pending for this Court’s consideration is a Motion for Limited Intervention filed by Alan M. Dershowitz, who seeks to intervene to “strike the outrageous and impertinent allegations made against him and [to] request[] a show cause order to the attorneys

he Court has taken it upon itself to strike the impertinent factual details from the Rule 21 Motion and related filings, the Court concludes that Mr. Derschowitz’s intervention in this case is unnecessary. Accordingly, his motion to intervene will be denied as moot.? Regarding whether a show cause order shoul