3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
day of March, 2009. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Jack Alan Goldberger EFTA00222107 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
d Ropers v. United States, 1951, 340 U.S. 367, 71 S.Ct. 438, and to require him to answer if 'it clearly appears to the court that he is mistaken.' Temple v. Commonwealth, 1880, 75 Va. 892, 899. However, if the witness, upon interposing his claim, were required to prove the hazard in the sense in which a claim is usu
nlaw.com Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2 Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 2
d, Rogers v. United States 1951, 340 U.S. 367, 71 S.Ct. 438, and to require him to answer if 'it clearly appears to the court that he is mistaken.' Temple v. Commonwealth, 1880, 75 Va. 892, 899. However, if the witness, upon interposing his claim, were required to prove the hazard in the sense in which a claim is usu
day of March, 2009. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Jack Alan Goldberger Stuart S. Mermelstein Es• Atterbu Go
d, Rogers v. United States 1951, 340 U.S. 367, 71 S.Ct. 438, and to require him to answer if 'it clearly appears to the court that he is mistaken.' Temple v. Commonwealth, 1880, 75 Va. 892, 899. However, if the witness, upon interposing his claim, were required to prove the hazard in the sense in which a claim is usu
Entities connected to both Alan Dershowitz and Temple v. Commonwealth

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONJane Doe
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATIONMichael J. Pike
PERSON
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON
Jean-Luc Brunel
PERSON
David Rodgers
PERSON
Sarah Kellen
PERSONAtterbury Goldberger & Weiss
ORGANIZATIONNadia Marcinkova
PERSONHaley Robson
PERSONLuttier & Coleman
ORGANIZATIONStuart S. Mermelstein
PERSONFisher
PERSONJANE DOE NO
PERSON