Epstein Secrets

e and am available to discuss this and any other issues at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, Goud? Gerald B. Lefcourt cati a .O i b m Alan Dershowitz cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Roy Black, Esq. EFTA00176530 • C.) c EFTA00176531 STEVEN PINKER Johnstone Family Professor DEPARTMENT OF PSYC

RTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY HARVARD UNIVERSITY Professor Alan Dershowitz Harvard Law School Harvard University Cambridge, MA 02138 June 28, 2007 Dear Alan, I'm happy to offer the help of my knowledge in linguistics to determine the natural interpretation of a statute you have inquired about. My commen

Goud? Gerald B. Lefcourt cati a .O i b m Alan Dershowitz cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Roy Black, Esq. EF

ns and legislation have been put into place; and many other business firms--established ones like General Electric and Xerox, newer ones like Tyco, WorldCom, and Global Crossing--have undergone probes or have even dissolved. Mean-while, the tacit or demonstrable complicity of members of boards of directo

18 view as sort of indicia of she should have known about what's 19 in these police reports, and they first of all say -- we get 20 back to this Dershowitz joint defense agreement issue, which I 21 touched on yesterday, but you're going to hear it again today, 22 so I think it's worth mentioning agai

nswer the question if it's not privileged." That's the 9 testimony that they say supports their assertion of this joint 10 defense agreement with Alan Dershowitz. 11 But there's more, your Honor. Mr. Edwards -- again, 12 who is a party in this deposition and not a lawyer -- chimes in 13 to the special ma

sertion of this joint 10 defense agreement with Alan Dershowitz. 11 But there's more, your Honor. Mr

he kind of questions that have 16 been disapproved in the Second Circuit. And that's Brink's 17 Inc. v. City of New York, which is in the papers; WorldCom 18 Security Litigation, also in the papers; and LiButti itself. 19 These are not technical objections. It serves no legitimate 20 evidentiary p

what they view as sort of indicia of she should have known about what's in these police reports, and they first of all say -- we get back to this Dershowitz joint defense agreement issue, which I touched on yesterday, but you're going to hear it again today, so I think it's worth mentioning again. And h

nswer the question if it's not privileged." That's the 9 testimony that they say supports their assertion of this joint 10 defense agreement with Alan Dershowitz. 11 But there's more, your Honor. Mr. Edwards -- again, 12 who is a party in this deposition and not a lawyer -- chimes in 13 to the special ma

sertion of this joint 10 defense agreement with Alan Dershowitz. 11 But there's more, your Honor. Mr

he kind of questions that have 16 been disapproved in the Second Circuit. And that's Brink's 17 Inc. v. City of New York, which is in the papers; WorldCom 18 Security Litigation, also in the papers; and LiButti itself. 19 These are not technical objections. It serves no legitimate 20 evidentiary p

1-vb --a Gerald B. Lefcourt hi4640 L..) 6Th Alan Dershowitz cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Roy Black, Esq. EF

ble to discuss this and any other issues at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, §c4-14 /( 0=1-vb --a Gerald B. Lefcourt hi4640 L..) 6Th Alan Dershowitz cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Roy Black, Esq. EFTA00284197 Tab A EFTA00284198 STEVEN PINKER Johnstone Family Professor DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLO

RTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY HARVARD UNIVERSITY Professor Alan Dershowitz Harvard Law School Harvard University Cambridge, MA 02138 June 28, 2007 Dear Alan, I'm happy to offer the help of my knowledge in linguistics to determine the natural interpretation of a statute you have inquired about. My commen

ons and legislation have been put into place; and many other business firms—established ones like General Electric and Xerox, newer ones like Tyco, WorldCom, and Global Crossing—have undergone probes or have even dissolved. Mean-while, the tacit or demonstrable complicity of members of boards of director

d am available to discuss this and any other issues at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, Go-a( Gerald B. Lefcourt alak,,,.1 44A),,5 Alan Dcrshowitz cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Roy Black, Esq. EFTA00226777 STEVEN PINKER Johnstone Family Professor DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY HARVARD UNIVERSITY

RTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY HARVARD UNIVERSITY Professor Alan Dershowitz Harvard Law School Harvard University Cambridge, MA 02138 June 28, 2007 Dear Alan, I'm happy to offer the help of my knowledge in linguistics to determine the natural interpretation of a statute you have inquired about. My commen

OF PSYCHOLOGY HARVARD UNIVERSITY Professor Alan Dershowitz Harvard Law School Harvard University Cambridg

ns and legislation have been put into place; and many other business firms--established ones like General Electric and Xerox, newer ones like Tyco, WorldCom, and Global Crossing--have undergone probes or have even dissolved. Mean-while, the tacit or demonstrable complicity of members of boards of directo

the dictates of the Supreme Court. Consider Dr. Alan Waldman, a forensic psychiatrist and neurologist

e appearance of grassroots support for their client's cause. Astroturf techniques have been used to: • block the transfer of federal licenses that WorldCom uses for its long distance and Internet services by Issue Dynamics Inc. using non-profit groups like the United Church of Christ • defeat the Clint

ssible to deal with cross- border failures," says Alan Bloom, head of restructuring at Ernst & Young, an

s not been uniform. American companies learned some lessons in 2000-02 when the bursting of the dotcom bubble brought down giants such as Enron and WorldCom. Quoted companies were more cautious about taking on debt in subsequent years. A report by the McKinsey Global Institute found that the non-financia