Epstein Secrets

F |S ao FBP WN F- 970 DO DN ODO OT BR W NY — ROUGH DRAFT TITLE ***ROUGH DRAFT TRANSCRIPT *** CASE NAME: BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL vs. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ WITNESS NAME: PAUL G. CASSELL DATE OF DEPOSITION: 10/16/15 This is an unedited, unproofread, | uncertified transcript for attorneys' information o

Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — Sweeder & Ross for Professor Dershowitz. Thereupon, PAUL G. CASSELL, having been first duly sworn, was examined and testified as follows: THE WITNESS: I do. DIRECT EXAMINATION BY MR. SI

ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — Sweeder & Ross for Professor Dershowitz. Thereupon, PAUL G. CASSELL, having been first

NAME: BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL vs. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ WITNESS NAME: PAUL G. CASSELL DAT

act what I'm doing, but I was aware, since the issue is, well, what's in the public record, I was aware that, you know, probably the most significant United States Supreme Court case argued in the last 20 years was Bush versus Gore, which was a case that essentially determined who was going to be President of the most powerfu

, 4:01 p.m. (Thereupon, a recess was taken.) THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are back on the video record, 4:04 p.m. (Thereupon, Kenneth A. Sweder, Esquire, Alan M. Dershowitz and Carolyn Cohen left the proceedings.) ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 420 MR, SCAROLA: The record should reflect that Mr. and Mrs.

fy sealing these presumptively-public documents. L DERSHOWITZ HAS NOT JUSTIFIED SEALING ALLEGED DEFAMATORY RECO

e to speak up. MR. SCOTT: You're going to have to speak up a little bit more, Counsel. MR. INDYKE: Objection. This is Darren Indyke. Anything that Alan might have to say to that, to the extent they are covered under conversations with Jeffrey Epstein, privileged under attorney-client privileges as

UIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 mention Professor Dershowitz's name once. A. I said flight logs. And let's ta

what I'm doing, but I was aware -- since the issue is, well, what's in the public record, I was aware that, you know, probably the most significant United States Supreme Court case argued in the last 20 years was Bush versus Gore, which was a case that essentially determined who was going to be President of the most powerfu

r use by several others, Perversion of Justice, The Miami including Prince AndrewiMg and retired Harvard Law Herald, November 29, 2018. professor Alan Dershowitz.18-IM?1 also claimed that Epstein, Maxwell and others had physically and sexually abused her.[1431 She alleged that the FBI may have been involved in

ntiffs to that case.LW.1 The addition accused Alan Dershowitz of sexually abusing a minor, Jane Doe 3, provided by Epstein.M The allegations against Dershowitz were stricken by the judge and eliminated from the case because he said they were outside the intent of the suit to re-open the plea agreement.EMID

luding Donald Trump, Leslie Wexner, Bill Clinton Alan Dershowitz, and Prince Andrew, Duke Yoric.M Co

sinesses and rescinded the individual health insurance mandate penalty of the Affordable Care Act He a_ppoMted_m_federaispellate ,judges and three United States Supreme Court justices. In foreign policy, Trump pursued an America First agenda, withdrawing Donald Trump Official portrait, 2017 45th President of the United

gag-21 Epstein also maintained long-term relationships with various high-profile individualsl_ including Donald Trump, Leslie Wexner, Bill Clinton) Alan Dershowitz, and Prince Andrew, Duke of York. Contents Early life Career htte://en,wikipedia.onlivviki/Jelfrey Epstein Jeffrey Epstein Epstein's final mug

had been sexually assaulted by Epstein and Maxwell in se arate locations in 1 6. affidavit was filed in suppo defamation suit by Virginia against Alan Dershowit2.±91 According to the affidavitilla had met Maxwell and Epstein at a New York art gallery reception in 1995. The affidavit says that in th

tiffs to that case.11321 The addition accused Alan Dershowitz of sexually abusing a minor, Jane Doe 3, provided by Epstein.M The allegations against Dershowitz were stricken by the judge and eliminated from the case because he said they were outside the intent of the suit to re-open the plea agreementWaa51

inesses and rescinded the individual health insurance mandate penalty of the Affordable Care Act. He appointed 54 federal appellate hikes and three United States Supreme Court justices. In foreign policy, Trump pursued an America First agenda, withdrawing Donald Trump Official portrait, 2017 45th President of the United

rth, FL 33461 Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A. Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss P.

as to the meaning of the statute would prevail over Plaintiffs view. See United States v. Santos 128 S.Ct. 2020, 2025 (2008). As summarized by the United States Supreme Court in Santos, supra, at 2025: ... The rule of lenity requires ambiguous criminal laws to be interpreted in favor of the defendants subjected to them.