Epstein Secrets

0700-10702 10/13/2009 Adam Horowitz Jacquie Johnson Depo Joint W/P Priv. 10724-1073 10/14/2009 Adam Horowitz Jacquie Johnson Epstein-depo of Alan Dershowitz Joint W/P Priv. 10897 10/29/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein Leslie Wexner Joint W/P Priv. 10992-11005 06/22/2009 Bradley Edwards Am

m Horowitz Jacquie Johnson Epstein-depo of Alan Dershowitz Joint W/P Priv. 10897 10/29/2009 Bradley Edwa

Adam Horowitz Jacquie Johnson Epstein-depo of Alan Dershowitz Joint W/P Priv. 10897 10/29/2009 B

privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 00150 04/24/2009 Litigation Team Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of adm

0700-10702 10/13/2009 Adam Horowitz Jacquie Johnson Depo Joint W/P Priv. 10724-1073 10/14/2009 Adam Horowitz Jacquie Johnson Epstein-depo of Alan Dershowitz Joint w/P Priv. 10897 10/29/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein Leslie Wexner Joint W/P Priv. 10992.11005 06/22/2009 Bradley Edwards Am

m Horowitz Jacquie Johnson Epstein-depo of Alan Dershowitz Joint w/P Priv. 10897 10/29/2009 Bradley Edwa

Adam Horowitz Jacquie Johnson Epstein-depo of Alan Dershowitz Joint w/P Priv. 10897 10/29/2009 B

privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 00150 04/24/2009 Litigation Team Rob Buschel Litigation Strategy Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of adm

otified Defendant that he intended to take the depositions of and was subpoenaing: (i) Donald Trump (real-estate magnate and business mogul); (ii) Alan Dershowiti (noted Harvard Law professor, constitutional attorney and one of EPSTEIN'S criminal defense attorneys); ill Clinton (Former President of the United

Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article

Litigation Team knew or should have known of the improper purpose that ROTHSTEIN was pursuing in the continuation of thMheme, ROTHSTEIN used RRA's Litigation Team in the EPSTEIN cases to put issues and evidence unrelated to and unnecessary to the claims pled in th Actions, but significantly beneficial to lu