Epstein Secrets

n the defamation action established that stories, sold to tabloids for large sums of money, were in fact false. Those accused by Ms. =, Professor Alan Dershowitz, for example, denounced her as a "serial liar." Regardless, Ms. is not one of the three accusers identified in Counts One through Four of the Supe

t false. Those accused by Ms. =, Professor Alan Dershowitz, for example, denounced her as a "serial liar."

n fact false. Those accused by Ms. =, Professor Alan Dershowitz, for example, denounced her as a "ser

ted to and appropriately joined with underlying 7 EFTA00091885 substantive crimes when the false declarations "concern the substantive offenses." Potamitis, 739 F.2d at 791. Such cases typically involve situations where the defendant was aware that he was being investigated and either lied to the grand

e statements underlying the Perjury Counts therefore do not "concern" the Mann Act Counts and cannot be joined as part of a "common scheme or plan." Potamitis, 739 F.2d at 791. The government makes only a half-hearted, and ineffective, attempt to allege a connection between the Perjury Counts and the Man

ents made by in 2015 were "obvious lies." Those wild, now known to be false, claims included her assertion that she had been sexually trafficked to Alan Dershowitz among other famous celebrities and politicians, and her age at the time of the claimed trafficking. The counts, collectively, are thus illogically

ion that she had been sexually trafficked to Alan Dershowitz among other famous celebrities and politicians,

ssertion that she had been sexually trafficked to Alan Dershowitz among other famous celebrities and po

dly made a materially false statement that relates directly to the underlying crime and the crime is temporally related to the false statement. The Potamitis case that the government relies upon primarily for this proposition is a good example. In that case, the defendant was charged with making false st

ion of justice because he lied to the FBI agents and the Grand Jury about the underlying crimes for which he was being investigated and questioned. Potamitis, 739 F.2d at 786-87; see also United States v. Ruiz, 894 F.2d 501 (2d Cir. 1992) (common plan or scheme between lying on a non- profit's loan applic

ents made by in 2015 were "obvious lies." Those wild, now known to be false, claims included her assertion that she had been sexually trafficked to Alan Dershowitz among other famous celebrities and politicians, and her age at the time of the claimed trafficking. The counts, collectively, are thus illogically

ion that she had been sexually trafficked to Alan Dershowitz among other famous celebrities and politicians,

ssertion that she had been sexually trafficked to Alan Dershowitz among other famous celebrities and po

dly made a materially false statement that relates directly to the underlying crime and the crime is temporally related to the false statement. The Potamitis case that the government relies upon primarily for this proposition is a good example. In that case, the defendant was charged with making false st

ion of justice because he lied to the FBI agents and the Grand Jury about the underlying crimes for which he was being investigated and questioned. Potamitis, 739 F.2d at 786-87; see also United States v. Ruiz, 894 F.2d 501 (2d Cir. 1992) (common plan or scheme between lying on a non- profit's loan applic