Epstein Secrets

elke, —against— GHISLA1NE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-

access to all filings and discovery materials, including third-party discovery, from that case." App. p 514. The district court rightly rejected Mr. Dershowitz's motion, explaining that this Court "has held that where there has been reasonable reliance by a party or non-party in providing discovery pursuan

dents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH M

ocument 40, 08/20/2020, 2913550, Page49 of 74 Certificate of Compliance with Rule 32(A) This brief complies with the type-volume limitation of Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(7)(B). It contains 9,112 words, excluding the parts of the brief exempted by Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(7)(B)(III). This brief complies with

gement and/or non-prosecution agreement, including efforts on his behalf by former President Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz. These materials are needed to prove the victims allegation that, after Epstein signed the non-prosecution agreement, his performance was delayed w

n, Prince Andrew, and Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz. These materials are needed to prove the victims

linton, Prince Andrew, and Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz. These materials are needed to prove

ssets implicated in an offender's wire fraud. * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). This summary constitutes no part of the opinion of the court. It has been prepared by court staff for the convenience of the reader.

King Tonja Coleman tw W. Chester Brewer Jack Alan Goldberger LONN WEISSBLUM, Clerk Fourth Distric

st continue to file documents in paper. Attorneys may request a hardship waiver from the court to continue to file paper documents. 1. MOTIONS: Ha. R. App. P. 9.300. Excessive motion practice is strongly discouraged. Any record material supporting a motion shall be contained in an appendix with the mot

ON INFORMATION STATEMENT Caotkin lust short Ilk Alan ,r. Leave for Non-Party Limited Intervenor to P

14, 2016) 6, 8 United States v. Smith, 776 F.2d 1104 (3d Cir. 1985) 7 United States v. Smith, 985 F. Supp. 2d 506 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 7 Rules Fed. R. App. P. 29 1 L.R. 29.1(b) 1 EFTA00792265 Case 18-2868, Document 153-2, 03/19/2019, 2521600, Page5 of 13 INTRODUCTION AND AMICUS STATEMENT OF INTER

d" therefrom. Id. at 6. The court also ordered Cooper & Kirk to "cease use of the [] materials in its preparation of Plaintiff's action against Mr. Dershowitz." Id. 11 EFTA00074920 Case 20-2413, Document 10-1, 07/30/2020, 2896538, Page19 of 38 Ms. Maxwell filed a motion to reconsider on July 29, 2020.

7) 13 Statutes All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) 27 Other Authorities U.S. CONST. amend. V 18, 27 U.S. CONST. amend. VI 18, 27 Rules Fed. R. App. P. 8(a)(2) 13 FED. R. Evm. 401 28 FED. R. EVID. 402 28 FED. R. EVID. 403 28 FED. R. Evm. 404(b) 28 iv EFTA00074908 Case 20-2413, Docume

looseleaf service updated annually). 3A Charles Alan Wright, Federa 1 Practice and Procedure SS 761-7

84 Act also amended 18 U.S.0 . 9S 3041, 3042, 3154, 3156, 3731, 3772, and 4 282; 28 U.S.C. § 636; Fed. R. Crim. P. 5, 15, 40, 46, and 54; a nd Fed. R. App. P. 9. II. Release or Detention Pending Trial A. Generally A person arrested for a federal off unnecessary delay before the nearest avai initial