Epstein Secrets

e maroon volume engraved with the following words: “Chief Judge David L. Bazelon 54 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017141 4.2.12 WC: 191694 Opinions 1962-1963 Alan M. Dershowitz, Law Clerk” It is a treasured possession. A year in the life of! And what a year it was. My first case involved a man named “Daniel Jackson Oliver

, he can instantly tell whether they know me from TV or from personal interactions—whether they know what he calls “The Dersh Character” or “the real Alan.” This sharp dichotomy between my public and private personas was brought home to me quite dramatically, when a major motion picture, Reversal of Fo

ty, a burial society, the Young Israel synagogue and the Torah V’Daas Yeshiva. Their day jobs were typical for their generation of Jewish immigrants. Louis Dershowitz, my paternal grandfather, sold corrugated boxes. Naphtali Ringel, my maternal grandfather, was a jeweler. My grandmothers, Ida and Blima, took care o

could aspire to work in an advertising firm or a “funeral parlor.” My mother asked whether I could be a lawyer, to which the counselor replied, “Mrs. Dershowitz, I’m afraid you have to go to college to be a lawyer, and your boy just isn’t college material.” Many years later, following a talk I gave at a temp

fe) HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017160 4.2.12 WC: 191694 Professor Dershowitz sees his job not as teaching “the specifics of la

eafter, my friends and I decided to form a social athletic club - - a euphemism for a Jewish gang, but without the rough stuff. We named our club The Shields and we designed our own jackets, which we got wholesale, since the father of one of our members owned an athletic store. His name was “Snot” Chaitman

personal and professional relationships with both Alan Greenberg, former Chairman of the Board, and Jim

v. MacFarlane, 897 F.2d 75, 80 (2d Cir. 1990)). Epstein does not have "'license to base claims of fraud on speculation and conclusory allegations."' Shields v. Citytrust Bancorp. Inc., 25 F.3d 1124, 1128 (2d Cir. 1994) (quoting O'Brien v. Nat'l Prop. -26- EFTA00314515 Analysts Partners, 936 F.2d 674,

secute him without an indict- ment. See 1 Charles Alan Wright, Fed. Prac- tice & Procedure § 121, at 518

tiff has actually succeeded on the merits." and, if so. whether an injunc- tion is an "appropriate remedy" (intern' quotation marks omitted)), with Shields ZUCCOlilli, 254 F.3d 476, 482 (3d Cir.2001) (stating that a court may grant a permanent injunction if it finds, inter alia, that "the mov- ing par