Epstein Secrets

08-80736-C1V-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs. vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. MOTION FOR LIMITED INTERVENTION BY ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ Alan M. Dershowitz (herein, "Prof. Dershowitz"), a nonparty to this litigation, is the victim of scurrilous allegations made in Jane Doe #3 and Jan

g duplicative discovery to that which is already being sought in Broward County Circuit Court. One forum is enough to litigate reputations] issues. B. DERSHOWITZ SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO INTERVENE IN THIS ACTION WHEN HE HAS DECLINED TO DEFEND HIS REPUTATION IN OTHER ACTIONS. Dershowitz also claims that he h

and they have spread around the world. What makes them doubly troubling is their irrelevancy: although categorically false, the allegations against Prof Dershowitz have absolutely nothing to do with whether the United States government violated its duty to confer with the Plaintiffs prior to entering into the n

in New York in Epstein's home. It was in Epstein's room (not the massage room). I was approximately 16 years old at the time. I called Dershowitz "Alan." I knew he was a famous professor. 27. The second time that I had sex with Dershowitz was at Epstein's house in Palm Beach. During this encounter

n-a I legal ions—tota Ily-fa Ise-38194285 I 573 (Dershow kz: "Right now. they have accused me of these .

e latest date on which, according to Dershowitz, the Government made the decision not to pursue federal criminal charges against Epstein. DE 285 at I. Dershowitz appears to be unaware that the Government told the victims well after that date that the Government was still "investigating" the case. DE 48 at 16.

2015 Page 27 of 40 attorneys proffered in her earlier motion — i.e., that Epstein sexually trafficked Jane Doc No. 3 to numerous persons, including Dcrshowitz. If the Court believes it would be useful. Jane Doe No. 3 requests an evidentiary hearing to prove she is telling the truth 19 and directs the Court

. at 122 (Palm Beach Cty. Cir. Ct. Oct. 8, 2009). In short, all the key conspirators in Epstein's sexual trafficking ring who could be asked about Derhowitz's involvement took the Fifth." This "[sJilence is . . . evidence of the most persuasive character." United States ex rd. Bilokumsky 'Tod, 263 U.S. 1

Thomas Scott Fla. Bar No. 149100 COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, P.A. -and- /s/ Kendall Coffey Kendall Coffey, Fla. Bar No. 259681 Benjamin H. Brodsky, Fla. Bar No. 73748 Counsel for Prof Alan Al. Dershowiiz 8 EFTA00188732 EFTA00188733 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 282 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/05/2015 P

ICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. NON PARTY ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE HIS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR LIMITED INTERVENTION NOT TO EXCEED EIGHTEEN (18) PAGES Alan M. Dershowit

ne Does 3 and 4 filed a Motion for Joinder in this action (DE 279), which included slanderous allegations against Alan M. Dershowitz (herein "Prof. Dershowitz.") 2. Prof. Dershowitz filed a motion for limited intervention for the limited purposes of moving to strike the outrageous and impertinent allegat

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. NON PARTY ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FI

for Limited Intervention not to exceed eighteen (18) pages. Dated: January 29, 2015 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Gabriel Groisman Kendall Coffey, Fla. Bar No. 259681 Gabriel Groisman, Fla. Bar No. 25644 Benjamin H. Brodsk Fla. Bar No. 73748 COFFEY BURLINGTON, 2601 South Bayshore Drive, PH 1 Miami, Florid

JANE DOES #2 Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ALAN DERSHOWITZ'S SUPPLEMENT TO HIS MOTION FOR LIMITED INTERVENTION (DE 282) Alan M. Dershowitz, a nonparty to this litigation, respectfully supplements his previously filed Motion for Limited Intervention (DE 282), as follows': The rights aff

decision not to federally prosecute Mr. Epstein did not moot their CVRA In the event the Court declines to accept this submission as a supplement to Dershowitz's pending Motion for Limited Intervention (DE 282), he respectfully reserves the right to include this as part of any Reply he might file. We hereb

ffs, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ALAN DERSHOWITZ'S SUPPLEMENT TO HIS MOTION FOR LIMITE

00 Facsimile: (305) 373-2294 -and- is/Kendall Coffey Kendall Coffey, Fla. Bar No. 259681 Gabriel Groisman, Fla. Bar No. 25644 Benjamin H. Brodsky, Fla. Bar No. 73748 COFFEY BURLINGTON, 2601 South Bayshore Drive, PH 1 Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: (305) 858-2900 Facsimile: (305) 858-5261 Counsel for A