Epstein Secrets

r the government, but not Jane Doe 3. The admissions sought by petitioners concerning the government's collection or awareness of information about Alan Dershowitz's whereabouts are simply not relevant to their claim that the government violated the CVRA. Whether the government collected or became aware of any i

ause the requests seek admissions either pertaining to Jane Doe 3's claims of sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz or pertaining to the possibility that Dershowitz may have witnessed sexual abuse. On April 7, 2015, the Court denied petitioners' motion to add Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 as petitioners in this cas

a July 6, 2007, letter from Gerald Lefcourt and Alan Dershowitz to four members of the USAO-SDFL, Alan

to the instant matter. This litigation involves petitioners' claims that the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL) violated the petitioners' rights under the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA) when the USAO-SDFL entered into a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey

ndrew, Duke of York), Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, Ken Starr, Lillian Sanchez, Jay Lefkowitz, and R

nce Andrew, Duke of York), Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, Ken Starr, Lillian Sanchez, Jay Lefko

ment, including efforts by former President Bill Clinton, Andrew Albert Christian Edward (a/k/a Prince Andrew, Duke of York), Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, Ken Starr, Lillian Sanchez, Jay Lefkowitz, and Roy Black on his behalf. EFTA00179727 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docke

d.6 As a fourth and final illustration, the victims requested information about why the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL) was "conflicted out" of considering issues relating to the Epstein matter, as well as any information that developed about that conflict after the

in the case." 27 EFTA00205650 See I3A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE & PRO

y have limited the USAO-SDFL's capacity to prosecute Epstein in the Southern District of Florida for his federal offenses against Petitioners," the USAO-SDFL did not bargain away the possibility of federal criminal charges being instituted in other districts based on the alleged sexual acts that Epstein c

cket 07/05/2013 Page 29 of 101 See I 3A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE & PRO

have limited the USAO-SDFL' s capacity to prosecute Epstein in the Southern District of Florida for his federal offenses against Petitioners,17 the USAO-SDFL did not bargain away the possibility of federal criminal charges being instituted in other districts based on the alleged sexual acts that Epstein c

cket 07/05/2013 Page 29 of 101 See I 3A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE & PRO

have limited the USAO-SDFL' s capacity to prosecute Epstein in the Southern District of Florida for his federal offenses against Petitioners,17 the USAO-SDFL did not bargain away the possibility of federal criminal charges being instituted in other districts based on the alleged sexual acts that Epstein c

ocket 07/05/2013 Page 29 of 101 See 13A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE & PRO

have limited the USAO-SDFL's capacity to prosecute Epstein in the Southern District of Florida for his federal offenses against Petitioners,17 the USAO-SDFL did not bargain away the possibility of federal criminal charges being instituted in other districts based on the alleged sexual acts that Epstein c

n the case." 27 EFTA00208849 See I 3A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE & PRO

have limited the USAO-SDFL' s capacity to prosecute Epstein in the Southern District of Florida for his federal offenses against Petitioners,17 the USAO-SDFL did not bargain away the possibility of federal criminal charges being instituted in other districts based on the alleged sexual acts that Epstein c