Epstein Secrets

ned counsel, to file this motion to compel the Government to provide answers to certain requests for admission and requests for production involving Alan Dershowitz or, in the alternative, to properly assert privilege over these discovery requests. On April 11, 2015, the victims sent a Second Request for Admiss

ne of Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorneys, Alan Dershowitz, the Government refused to provide any information, asserting that any information about Dershowitz was irrelevant to this case and, in some instances, was privileged from production. Following discussions between counsel for the victims and the G

r admission and requests for production involving Alan Dershowitz or, in the alternative, to properly a

07) (internal quotations omitted). The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are broadly written and "strongly favor full discovery whenever possible." Farnsworth I Procter and Gamble Co., 758 F.2d 1545, 1547 (11th Cir.1985). Thus, as this Court has previously ruled in this case, the bottom line is that "[d]is

lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 11420-11426 08/24/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley Edwards Serving Alan Dershowitz Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 20201-20204 08/24/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley Edwards Serving Dershowitz Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley Edwards Serving Alan Dershowitz Work product; attorney/client priv

Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION protected by privacy rights 06118-06146 09/15/2009 Seth Lehrman Bradley Edwards Farnsworth v. Marys case Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evid

lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 11420-11426 08/24/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley Edwards Serving Alan Dershowitz Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 20201-20204 08/24/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley Edwards Serving Dershowitz Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley Edwards Serving Alan Dershowitz Work product; attorney/client priv

Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE LQ FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION protected by privacy rights 06118-06146 09/15/2009 Seth Lehrman Bradley Edwards Farnsworth v. Macys case Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evid