Epstein Secrets

yde and Conyers replied: REP. HYDE: I thank you, Professor Dershowitz. I don't thank you for criticizing the motives, s

apacities, recently told me that before anything involving these issues left his office, Senator Kennedy would tell his staff members, “check it with Alan.” It was high honor and privilege to assist so great a senator on so many occasions. The last time I was him was just months before his death when he

ny real sense that justice in some way had gone astray.” And one commentator snidely observed that Von Bulow’s “recruitment of Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz shortly after his conviction would tend to reinforce” the view that Claus Von Bulow “was no longer protecting his innocence, merely the methods used

his conviction would tend to reinforce” the view that Claus Von Bulow “was no longer protecting his innocence, merely the methods used to catch him...Dershowitz enjoys a wide reputation as a last resort for convicted criminals, being especially keep at finding legal loopholes that render his clients’ convicti

unsolicited advice, such as when I repeatedly urged him to commute the life sentence of Jonathan Pollard to time served. I pestered him so much about Pollard that he finally told me he didn’t want to hear anything more about it. I replied, “You can choose not to listen, but I’m not going to stay quiet.” In

secute him without an indict- ment. See 1 Charles Alan Wright, Fed. Prac- tice & Procedure § 121, at 518

3, 925 (N.D. 111.1964) (motion to quash grand jury subpoe. nas). EFTA00191855 808 770 FEDERAL REPORTER, 2d SERIES "reasonable basis" standard. Pollard, 283 FSupp. at 258; Reporters Committee, 693 F2d at 1064. See also Bran:burg v. Hayes; 408 U.S. 665, 699-01, 707-08, 92 S.Ct. 2646, 2665-66, 2669

en & Sir- cusa ("RMJS"), and others, principally Alan Garfinkel and Leigh Katzman, form- ing Katzman Ga

result in more limited waiver, as to the materials actually produced. This concept was clari- fied further y the Court in Martin Mari- etta Corp. . Pollard, 856 F.2d 619, 626 i (4th Cir.19 ), where it stated: irst and most generally, opinion work product is to be accorded great protection by the cou