Epstein Secrets

ENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 EDWARDS, et al., Plaintiffs / Counterclaim Defendants, v. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant / Counterclaim Plaintiff. DEFENDANT / COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF ALAN DERSHOWITZ'S MEMROANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO JANE DOE NO. 3'S MOTION TO

72 EDWARDS, et al., Plaintiffs / Counterclaim Defendants, v. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant / Counterclaim Plaintiff. DEFENDANT / COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF ALAN DERSHOWITZ'S MEMROANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO JANE DOE NO. 3'S MOTION TO OUASH OR FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Defendant / Counterclaim Plaintiff Alan Dershowitz ("Dershowi

ena served on Jane Doe No. 3 is intended to accomplish precisely that goal. For example, the subpoena seeks "[a]ll documents that reference by name, Alan M. Dershowitz, which support and/or confirm the allegations set forth in" Jane Doe No. 3's declarations submitted in the Federal Action, as well as "[a]ny documen

im Plaintiff. DEFENDANT / COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF ALAN DERSHOWITZ'S MEMROANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO JANE DO

e defenses without questioning Jane Doe No. 3 about her false and outrageous allegations against him. For this reason, Jane Doe No. 3's reliance on Peisach v. Antzma, 539 So. 2d 544, 547 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), is misplaced. In Peisach, the Third District held that an ex-husband in a post-divorce custody d

im Plaintiff. DEFENDANT / COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF ALAN DERSHOWITZ'S MEMROANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO JANE DO

ENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 EDWARDS, et al., Plaintiffs / Counterclaim Defendants, v. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant / Counterclaim Plaintiff. DEFENDANT / COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF ALAN DERSHOWITZ'S MEMROANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO JANE DOE NO. 3'S MOTION TO

ted pro hac vice) WILEY REIN LLP 1776 K Street NW Washington, DC 20006 20 EFTA00584081 Phone: (202) 719-7000 Fax: (202) 719-7049 Counsel for Alan M. Dershowitz 21 EFTA00584082 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E- mail on May 6, 2015,46,;

ena served on Jane Doe No. 3 is intended to accomplish precisely that goal. For example, the subpoena seeks "[a]ll documents that reference by name, Alan M. Dershowitz, which support and/or confirm the allegations set forth in" Jane Doe No. 3's declarations submitted in the Federal Action, as well as "[a]ny documen

e defenses without questioning Jane Doe No. 3 about her false and outrageous allegations against him. For this reason, Jane Doe No. 3's reliance on Peisach v. Amino, 539 So. 2d 544, 547 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), is misplaced. In Peisach, the Third District held that an ex-husband in a post-divorce custody di

IRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, VS. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. / DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ’S REDACTED MOTION TO MODIFY CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER Defenda

! JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, and CASE NO. CACE 15-000072 PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs, V. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. MOTION TO QUASH OR FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING SUBPOENA SERVED ON NON-PARTY JANE DOE NO. 3 Non-party Jane Doe 3, by and through unde

inor child and a victim of sexual trafficking. There is no reason this non-party should be forced to produce her diary from when she was a child. See Peisach v. Antuna, 539 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1989) (court of appeal holding that trial court departed from the essential requirements of law by granting d