Epstein Secrets

true. Each time the story is re told it changes with new salacious details about public figures and world leaders and now it is alleged by Ms that Alan Derschowitz is involved in having sexual relations with her, which he denies. Ms claims are obvious lies and should be treated as such and not publicised as n

world leaders and now it is alleged by Ms that Alan Derschowitz is involved in having sexual relatio

EXHIBIT N EFTA00097376 From: < Date: 2 January 2015 at 20:38 Subject: Ghislaine Maxwell To: Rossacuity Gow < bcc: k To Whom It May Concern, Please find attached a quotable statement on behalf of Ms Maxwell. No further communication will be provided by

7433-RWS Document 751-1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 2 of 2 From: <[email protected]> Date: 2 January 2015 at 20:38 Subject: Ghislaine Maxwell To: Rossacuity Gow <[email protected]> bec: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected].

stake In Filing Sexual Misconduct Charges Against Professor Dershowitz Professor Alan M. Dershowitz released the follow

impson, [email protected] April 8, 2016 Lawyers Acknowledge Mistake In Filing Sexual Misconduct Charges Against Professor Dershowitz Professor Alan M. Dershowitz released the following statement regarding resolution of the case styled Bradley Edwards, et al. v. Alan M. Dershowitz, Case No. CACE 15-000072 (Cir.

he Court has taken it upon itself to strike the impertinent factual details from the Rule 21 Motion and related filings, the Court concludes that Mr. Derschowitz’s intervention in this case is unnecessary. Accordingly, his motion to intervene will be denied as moot.’ Regarding whether a show cause order shoul

1 Motion and related filings should be stricken from the record. Pending for this Court’s consideration is a Motion for Limited Intervention filed by Alan M. Dershowitz, who seeks to intervene to “strike the outrageous and impertinent allegations made against him and [to] request[] a show cause order to the attorneys

he Court has taken it upon itself to strike the impertinent factual details from the Rule 21 Motion and related filings, the Court concludes that Mr. Derschowitz’s intervention in this case is unnecessary. Accordingly, his motion to intervene will be denied as moot.? Regarding whether a show cause order shoul

7433-RWS Document 539-6 Filed 01/06/17 Page 2 of 2 From: <[email protected]> Date: 2 January 2015 at 20:38 Subject: Ghislaine Maxwell To: Rossacuity Gow <[email protected]> bcc: [email protected], P,[email protected], [email protected], [email protected].