Epstein Secrets

have returned campaign contributions from him. But Mr. Epstein fought back, as- sembling a team of star lawyers, in- cluding Gerald B. Lefcourt and Alan M. Dershowitz, a friend of his, to look into the backgrounds of his young ac- cusers. Mr. Lefcourt says that the police acted "outrageously" and that his cli- e

the belief of Rutgers University biologist Robert Trivers, whose talk at Harvard's Program for Evolutionary Dynamics (PED) was axed after he called Dershowitz a "Nazi-like apologist" for his "rationalization of Israeli attacks on Lebanese civilians." Trivers told the Harvard Crimson a PED official said he

of lawyers that also includes Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz and for- mer Whitewater prosecutor Ken

BIDS AS LOW AS $100 Properties in Brevard, Canton, Cliarlette, Citrus, Moy, Mend* Cumberland, Duda, Escambia, Hagler, Gadsden, Minis!, Gull, Beano, Hendry, Hernando,111 lids em NNW MOM counties' Now only 15% DOWN PAYMENT required. EFTA00188361 48 THE PALM BEACH POST • TUESDAY, JULY25, 2006 Indic

al courts. See, SCI Funeral Svs. of Fla., Inc. v. Henry, 839 So. 2d 702, n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (“As the

sputed facts submitted by Mr. Edwards in support of his Motion for Summary Judgment, Edwards had a sound legal basis for believing that Donald Trump, Allen Dershowitz, Bill Clinton, Tommy Mattola, David Copperfield and Governor Bill Richardson had relevant and discoverable information (Exhibit “A” — Edwards’ Statem

Exhibit “N” at 913. | 72. Edwards provided notice that he intended to depose Alan Dershowitz. Edwards possessed a legitimate basis for doing so: (a) Dershowitz is believed to have been friends with Epstem for many years; (b) in one news article Dershowitz comments that, “I’m on my 20th book... The only pers

Paul McCartney leads tributes as Wings guitarist Henry 734 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014666 --- PAGE BREAK ---

1 Motion and related filings should be stricken from the record. Pending for this Court’s consideration is a Motion for Limited Intervention filed by Alan M. Dershowitz, who seeks to intervene to “strike the outrageous and impertinent allegations made against him and [to] request[] a show cause order to the attorneys

he Court has taken it upon itself to strike the impertinent factual details from the Rule 21 Motion and related filings, the Court concludes that Mr. Derschowitz’s intervention in this case is unnecessary. Accordingly, his motion to intervene will be denied as moot.? Regarding whether a show cause order shoul