Epstein Secrets

this? 22 New York house of Mr. Epstein? 23 0 Prince Andrew. Have you ever seen 23 MR. CRITTON: Form. 24

22 New York house of Mr. Epstein? 23 0 Prince Andrew. Have you ever seen 23 MR. CRITTON: Form. 24

there you only saw Ghislaine Maxwell three times? 24 A Not live years. 25 0 Okay. From the end of 2004 through 2005 you ESQUIRE i• A I • ride. Gallo C•apny Toll Free: 866.709.8777 Facsimile: 561.394.2621 Suite 600 4440 PGA Boulevard Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 www.esguiresolutfons.com EFTA

O. Most people do. 23 A. Yes. 24 O. You wouldn't mistake a 13 or 14 or 15 year old 25 fora 20yearold. 143 1 you familiar with a flight where Prince Andrew was on the 2 airplane? 3 A. I don't know if I remember him being on 4 the airplane or not. I know that he has been on the 5 airplane or one o

143 1 you familiar with a flight where Prince Andrew was on the 2 airplane? 3 A. I don't know if I

e recent things. 24 O. I'm going to skip this one because it talks 25 about very similar people that you've already road. • ESQUIRE se Agnate. Gallo [apse, Toll Free: Facsimile: www.esquiresolutions.com EFTA00181420 Larry Eugene Morrison - Volume I October 6, 2009 157 1 A. Okay. 2 0. N

o significance" was derided by political blogger Andrew Sullivan. On August 10, 2006, Brooks wrote a col

f Special Projects at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution—a preeminent, globally recognized scientific laboratory. For more than 25 years, Dr. Gallo has been at the forefront of ocean exploration, participating in and being witness to the development of new technologies and scientific discoveri

orney Alex] Acosta, [Former USAO-SDFL supervisor Andrew] Lourie, or Villafaiia agreed to the nonprosecut

1 Airways, Inc., 853 F. Supp. 2d 1209 (S.D. Ha. 2012) 23,24 United States v. Forde, 740 F. Supp. 2d 406 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) passim United States v. Gallo, No. 98 Cr. (KIK), 1999 WL 9848 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 11, 1999) 275,281 United States v. Gambino, 838 F. Supp. 744 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) 70 United States v.

hild Exploitation and Obscenity Section ("CEOS"), Andrew Oosterbaan, during the investigation and plea di

Airways, Inc., 853 F. Supp. 2d 1209 (S.D. Fla. 2012) 23, 24 United States v. Forde, 740 F. Supp. 2d 406 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) passim United States v. Gallo, No. 98 Cr. (JGK), 1999 WL 9848 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. II, 1999) 275, 281 United States v. Gambino, 838 F. Supp. 744 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) 70 United States v

hild Exploitation and Obscenity Section ("CEOS"), Andrew Oosterbaan, during the investigation and plea di

Airways, Inc., 853 F. Supp. 2d 1209 (S.D. Fla. 2012) 23, 24 United States v. Forde, 740 F. Supp. 2d 406 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) passim United States v. Gallo, No. 98 Cr. (JGK), 1999 WL 9848 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. II, 1999) 275, 281 United States v. Gambino, 838 F. Supp. 744 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) 70 United States v

hild Exploitation and Obscenity Section ("CEOS"), Andrew Oosterbaan, during the investigation and plea di

l Airways, Inc., 853 F. Supp. 2d 1209 (S.D. Fla. 2012) 19, 20 United States v. Forde, 740 F.Supp.2d 406 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) passim United States v. Gallo, No. 98 Cr. (JGK), 1999 WL 9848 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. II, 1999) 183, 189 United States v. Gambino, 838 F. Supp. 744 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) 48 United States v

hild Exploitation and Obscenity Section ("CEOS"), Andrew Oosterbaan, during the investigation and plea di

Airways, Inc., 853 F. Supp. 2d 1209 (S.D. Fla. 2012) 23, 24 United States v. Forde, 740 F. Supp. 2d 406 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) passim United States v. Gallo, No. 98 Cr. (JGK), 1999 WL 9848 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. II, 1999) 275, 281 United States v. Gambino, 838 F. Supp. 744 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) 70 United States v

admissible (Motion in Limine 3).................+ 8 4. Louis Freeh’s testimony and report are admissible evidence (Motion in Limine 4) ....... 9 5. Prince Andrew and Buckingham Palace’s denials of Plaintiff's claims are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted (Motion in Limine 5)... i.e seeeesseeseere

D. Miss. Jan. 11, 2013)... eeeeeeeseeees 24 Gaillard v. Jim’s Water Service, Inc., 535 F.3d 771, 778-779 (8th Cir. 2008)........cssceeseeseeeeeees 22 Gallo v. Ricci, 814 N.Y.S.2d 422, 423 (2006)... eesseescecsseessecseeceseeseesseeeeeeseeeseeeseeeseeesseeseeesaeees 36 Geraty v. Vill. of Antioch, No. 09 C

sible evidence (Motion in Limine 4) ....... 9 5. Prince Andrew and Buckingham Palace’s denials of Plaintiff's cl

370, at *1 (S.D. Miss. Jan. 11, 2013)... cee 24 Gaillard v. Jim’s Water Service, Inc., 535 F.3d 771, 778-779 (8th Cir. 2008)........0..ccccee cece 22 Gallo v. Ricci, 814 N.Y .S.2d 422, 423 (2006) ..o.c.ccccccccccceeseseseesetenseseeeeseeesesenecsenssenenseeeeeeeerenes 36 Geraty v. Vill. of Antioch, No. 0