Epstein Secrets

Was [Prince] Andrew Involved with Teenage Girls? Pervert's Aide Quizzed Over Prince, Mirror (UK), March 14, 2011, at 11 (discussing involvement of Prince Andrew with Jeffrey Epstein's sexual affairs); Bill Knew, Says Perv's Masseuse, New York Post, March 7, 2011, at 7 (discussing former President Bill Clint

ual abuse of minor girls. See, e.g., Was [Prince] Andrew Involved with Teenage Girls? Pervert's Aide Quiz

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Steven J. Solomon, Esq. Gray Robinson, P.A. 20 EFTA00708312 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1603 Filed 04/08/11 Page 21 of 23 Coquina Investments do Patricia A. Redmond, Esq. (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Michael I. Goldberg, Esq. Las Olas Centre - Suite 1600 (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) LMB Funding G

1 (Via US Marl) Carpenter & Berger, PL 6400 N. Andrew Ave, suite 370 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 (Via U

f Ira Sochet do Phil Hudson, Esq. 200 South Biscayne Blvd, Suite 3600 Miami, Florida 33130 E-Mail: [email protected] (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Coquina Investments do Patricia A. Redmond, Esq. 150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200 Miami, Florida 33130 E-Mail: [email protected] (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

1 (Via US Mail) Carpenter & Berger, PL 6400 N. Andrew Ave, suite 370 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 (Via U

ble Intervivos Trust of Ira Sochet do Phil Hudson, Esq. 200 South Biscayne Blvd, Suite 3600 Miami, Florida 33130 E-Mail: (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Coquina Investments do Patricia A. Redmond, Esq. 150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200 Miami, Florida 33130 E-Mail: (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Michael I. Goldberg, Esq.

y kind of evidence against Prof. Dershowitz. See, Coquina Investments, 760 F.3d at 1310 (11th Cir. 2014). Conclusion I

ut keep those alleged figures anonymous? The bad faith against Prof. Dershowitz is apparent’. ' Similarly, Jane Doe #3’s allegations that she named Prince Andrew because of outstanding 5 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010739 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 306 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2015 Page 6 of

w involved in “lobbying efforts to persuade the Government to give him a more favorable plea arrangement,” and because her allegations against Prince Andrews occurred in London, therefore “affect[ing] foreign commerce” are patently absurd. (DE 291 at 20 and 18, fn. 10.) Because Jane Doe #3’s other allegati