Epstein Secrets

Prince Andrew, and it's actually not his denial, as I 24 understand it, Buckingham Palace's denial of the allegation of 25 my client. But again, Prince Andrew is not on the witness SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00794570 16 H3V0GIU1 1 list, we're not able to cross examine him,

U1 1 list, we're not able to cross examine him, so what they want to 2 do is introduce triple hearsay of Buckingham Palace saying what 3 Prince Andrews said in a news article without the reporter 4 against my client without our ability to cross examine him on 5 that. 6 So your Honor, they've tr

who has put her reputation 14 at issue. Having the Duke of York and Buckingham Palace issue 15 denials is not h

motion reads like a list 9 of everything plaintiff has lied about or anything that would 10 undercut her claim for damages. 11 Plaintiff quoted Passim in her reply brief from a 12 particular federal evidence treatise, and I would like to tell 13 the Court, she left out the most important parts,

s about Prince Andrew, and it's actually not his denial, as I understand it, Buckingham Palace's denial of the allegation of my client. But again, Prince Andrew is not on the witness SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011318 10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21

16 H3VOGIU1 list, we're not able to cross examine him, so what they want to do is introduce triple hearsay of Buckingham Palace saying what Prince Andrews said in a news article without the reporter against my client without our ability to cross examine him on that. So your Honor, they've tried to argu

rse, who has put her reputation at issue. Having the Duke of York and Buckingham Palace issue denials is not hearsa

The omnibus motion reads like a list of everything plaintiff has lied about or anything that would undercut her claim for damages. Plaintiff quoted Passim in her reply brief froma particular federal evidence treatise, and I would like to tell the Court, she left out the most important parts, and that i

ld not be an issue relevant to this trial. Next, your Honor, they also seek to include statements, hearsay statements and newspaper articles about Prince Andrew, and it's actually not his denial, as I understand it, Buckingham Palace's denial of the allegation of my client. But again, Prince Andrew is not o

3VOGIU1 16 list, we're not able to cross examine him, so what they want to do is introduce triple hearsay of Buckingham Palace saying what Prince Andrews said in a news article without the reporter against my client without our ability to cross examine him on that. So your Honor, they've tried to ar

rse, who has put her reputation at issue. Having the Duke of York and Buckingham Palace issue denials is not hears

he omnibus motion reads like a list of everything plaintiff has lied about or anything that would undercut her claim for damages. Plaintiff quoted Passim in her reply brief from a particular federal evidence treatise, and I would like to tell the Court, she left out the most important parts, and that