Epstein Secrets

D, ¶ 15. The first declaration actually included multiple photographs purportedly of Jane Doe No. 3 as a minor, including one of Jane Doe No. 3 and Prince Andrew. Id. ¶ 32. With respect to Dershowitz, Jane Doe No. 3's first declaration provided gratuitous (and false) details about six specific instances in wh

d the names of prominent people, including Prince Andrew. That the allegations were improper and irrespon

eneral public, even though such secrecy violated the Crime Vietims=Rights-26tetr Id. The Joinder Motion included similar public allegations against Prince Andrew. Edwards and Cassell filed the Joinder Motion on the public docket in the Federal Action, without any accompanying motion to seal. The Joinder Moti

9 and that Epstein "kept Jane Doe #3 as his sex slave from about 1999 through 2002, when she managed to escape to a foreign country." Id. at 4. The Joinder Motion alleges that "Epstein also sexually trafficked the then-minor Jane Doe [No. 3], making her available for sex to politically-connected and financiall

d the names of prominent people, including Prince Andrew. That the allegations were improper and irrespon

views and avoided rather than sought publicity. As to the federal lawsuit, Judge Marra has already held that the allegations against Dershowitz (and Prince Andrew) should never have been included in Jane Doe No. 3's pleadings at all. And, even if those allegations had some legitimate purpose, which Judge Marra

general public, even though such secrecy violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act. Id. The Joinder Motion included similar public allegations against Prince Andrew. Edwards and Cassell filed the Joinder Motion on the public docket in the Federal Action, without any accompanying motion to seal. The Joinder Moti

9 and that Epstein "kept Jane Doe #3 as his sex slave from about 1999 through 2002, when she managed to escape to a foreign country." Id. at 4. The Joinder Motion alleges that "Epstein also sexually trafficked the then-minor Jane Doe [No. 3], making her available for sex to politically-connected and financiall

rovided specific reasons why Jane Doe No. 3’s participation was relevant to the case, including the pending discovery issues regarding Dershowitz and Prince Andrew. DE 280 at 9-10 (explaining several reasons participation of new victims was relevant to existing issues). After the motion was filed, various news o

lly seeking information about Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, and others. Further efforts from the Government

f Epstein’s victims and the general public, even though such secrecy violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Dershowitz Counterclaim at § 15 (quoting Joinder Motion at 4). Remarkably, having quoted at length from the Joinder Motion in his Counterclaim in this case, Dershowitz now seeks to have that very same lan