Epstein Secrets

any assertion that Dershowitz was a "co-conspirator" with any assertion that Dershowitz negotiated the NPA for his any actions allegedly taken by Prince Andrew, Duke of York, 24. All Documents Concerning any request for the deposition of Dershowitz. 25. All Documents Concerning any investigation of Dersh

PA for his any actions allegedly taken by Prince Andrew, Duke of York, 24. All Documents Concerning any

is any actions allegedly taken by Prince Andrew, Duke of York, 24. All Documents Concerning any request for t

d the NPA for his any actions allegedly taken by Prince Andrew, Duke of York, 24. All Documents Concerning any request for t

CATE OF SERVICE WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E- mail on February 11, 2015 to: Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denny et al and Burlington, ■., counsel for Plaintiff and to Kendall B. Coffey, Esquire, Coffey and COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, Attorneys for Defendant 9150 S.

D, ¶ 15. The first declaration actually included multiple photographs purportedly of Jane Doe No. 3 as a minor, including one of Jane Doe No. 3 and Prince Andrew. Id. ¶ 32. With respect to Dershowitz, Jane Doe No. 3's first declaration provided gratuitous (and false) details about six specific instances in wh

d the names of prominent people, including Prince Andrew. That the allegations were improper and irrespon

eneral public, even though such secrecy violated the Crime Vietims=Rights-26tetr Id. The Joinder Motion included similar public allegations against Prince Andrew. Edwards and Cassell filed the Joinder Motion on the public docket in the Federal Action, without any accompanying motion to seal. The Joinder Moti

RTIFICATE OF SERVICE WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E- mail on May 9, 201 to: Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denny et al and counsel for Plaintiffs, and to Sigrid McCawley, Esquire, Boies Schiller & Flexner, counsel for Jane Doe No. 3, at COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, At

d the names of prominent people, including Prince Andrew. That the allegations were improper and irrespon

views and avoided rather than sought publicity. As to the federal lawsuit, Judge Marra has already held that the allegations against Dershowitz (and Prince Andrew) should never have been included in Jane Doe No. 3's pleadings at all. And, even if those allegations had some legitimate purpose, which Judge Marra

general public, even though such secrecy violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act. Id. The Joinder Motion included similar public allegations against Prince Andrew. Edwards and Cassell filed the Joinder Motion on the public docket in the Federal Action, without any accompanying motion to seal. The Joinder Moti

WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E- mail on May 6, 2015,46,; S-204544ar554046 to: Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denny et al and counsel for Plaintiffs, and to Sigrid McCawley, Esquire, Boies Schiller & Flexner, counsel for Jane Doe No. 3, at COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, Att