11
Shared Docs
11
Same-Page
11 / 11
Mentions
New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 12, 2019
ly applies to those who attempt to purchase underage sex, not merely the pimps of actual exploited children") (citing United States v. Roberts, 174 F. App's 475 (1 I th Cir. 2006) (in which defendant was convicted under sections 1591(a) and 1594(a) even though no actual children were involved)). CONCLUS
New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 12, 2019
ly applies to those who attempt to purchase underage sex, not merely the pimps of actual exploited children") (citing United States v. Roberts, 174 F. App's 475 (1 I th Cir. 2006) (in which defendant was convicted under sections 1591(a) and 1594(a) even though no actual children were involved)). CONCLUS
New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 12, 2019
ly applies to those who attempt to purchase underage sex, not merely the pimps of actual exploited children") (citing United States v. Roberts, 174 F. App's 475 (1 I th Cir. 2006) (in which defendant was convicted under sections 1591(a) and 1594(a) even though no actual children were involved)). CONCLUS
New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 12, 2019
ly applies to those who attempt to purchase underage sex, not merely the pimps of actual exploited children") (citing United States v. Roberts, 174 F. App's 475 (1 I th Cir. 2006) (in which defendant was convicted under sections 1591(a) and 1594(a) even though no actual children were involved)). CONCLUS
New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 12, 2019
ly applies to those who attempt to purchase underage sex, not merely the pimps of actual exploited children") (citing United States v. Roberts, 174 F. App's 475 (1 I th Cir. 2006) (in which defendant was convicted under sections 1591(a) and 1594(a) even though no actual children were involved)). CONCLUS
New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 July 12, 2019
ly applies to those who attempt to purchase underage sex, not merely the pimps of actual exploited children") (citing United States v. Roberts, 174 F. App's 475 (11th Cir. 2006) (in which defendant was convicted under sections 1591(a) and 1594(a) even though no actual children were involved)). CONCLUSIO
New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 12, 2019
ly applies to those who attempt to purchase underage sex, not merely the pimps of actual exploited children") (citing United States v. Roberts, 174 F. App's 475 (1 I th Cir. 2006) (in which defendant was convicted under sections 1591(a) and 1594(a) even though no actual children were involved)). CONCLUS
New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 12, 2019
ly applies to those who attempt to purchase underage sex, not merely the pimps of actual exploited children") (citing United States v. Roberts, 174 F. App's 475 (1 I th Cir. 2006) (in which defendant was convicted under sections 1591(a) and 1594(a) even though no actual children were involved)). CONCLUS
New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 12, 2019
ly applies to those who attempt to purchase underage sex, not merely the pimps of actual exploited children") (citing United States v. Roberts, 174 F. App's 475 (1 I th Cir. 2006) (in which defendant was convicted under sections 1591(a) and 1594(a) even though no actual children were involved)). CONCLUS
New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 12, 2019
ly applies to those who attempt to purchase underage sex, not merely the pimps of actual exploited children") (citing United States v. Roberts, 174 F. App's 475 (1 I th Cir. 2006) (in which defendant was convicted under sections 1591(a) and 1594(a) even though no actual children were involved)). CONCLUS
Entities connected to both Prince Andrew and F. App's

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
United States
LOCATION
Michael Cohen
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Stephen Hawking
PERSON
George Mitchell
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSONMartin Weinberg
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
New York
LOCATION
Geoffrey S. Berman
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Michael Jackson
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION
Harry Reid
PERSON
Jes Staley
PERSON