Epstein Secrets

rew Albert Christian Edward (a/k/a Prince Andrew, Duke of York), Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, Ken Sta

ll Clinton, Andrew Albert Christian Edward (a/k/a Prince Andrew, Duke of York), Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, Ken Sta

ll Clinton, Andrew Albert Christian Edward (a/k/a Prince Andrew, Duke of York), Harvard Law Professor Alan Dersh

luding efforts by former President Bill Clinton, Andrew Albert Christian Edward (a/k/a Prince Andrew, Duk

tionships" and that "[t]his principle has been applied to fiduciary relationships beyond the traditional trust context"); see also In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 112 F.3d 910, 919-21 (8th Cir. 1997) (government attorneys have duty to report wrongdoing). Communications Facilitating Crime-Fraud-Misconduct Not

New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza Ncw York, Ncw York 10007 January 16, 20

its Act must be justified by "'compelling necessity . . . shown with particularity." Howell Opinion, 2017 WL 3278929 at *3 (quoting In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 797 F.2d 676, 681 (8th Cir. 1986)). 8. This application sets forth facts showing that there is a compelling necessity for a non- disclosure order

llowing: U.S. Attorney's Office, SDNY One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 s/ Christian R. Ever

material is in the possession of a third- party, a defendant has standing to challenge a grand jury subpoena of that material. Matter of Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Feb. 18, 1988, 685 F. Supp. 49, 51 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) (law firm could intervene and join motion to quash grand jury subpoena issued to private 1

nter & Berger, PL 130 North ISth Street 6400 N. Andrew Avenue, # 370 Philadelphia, PA 19103-6998 Ft. L

ally, Bradley J. Edwards, individually, and L.M., individually. 5. On or about April 17, 2010, counsel for EPSTEIN in the state court had served a Subpoena Duces Tecum for Deposition - Documents Only, on STETTIN in his capacity as Trustee, in an attempt to obtain documents relevant to issues in the state court case