Epstein Secrets

rida child sex den. Schoolchildren we=e among hundreds of callers who apparently rang to arrange massages for th= 58-year-old billionaire friend of Prince Andrew, who was later con=icted of child sex offences. And Ghislaine Maxwell, 49-year-old daughter of the disgraced m=dia mogul Robert Maxwell, is apparent

for th= 58-year-old billionaire friend of Prince Andrew, who was later con=icted of child sex offences.

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2011 2:29 AM To: Mike Sitrick Subject: Re: yes On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Mike =itrick < Is this the piece you want cor=ected? News 'GHISLAINE HAS FEMALES FOR MR JE';

ssages for the 58-year-old billionaire friend of Prince Andrew. who was later convicted of child sex offences.

for the 58-year-old billionaire friend of Prince Andrew. who was later convicted of child sex offences.

To: Mike Sitrick[ a] From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Wed 3/9/2011 2:29:05 AM Subject: Re: yes On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Mike Sitrick ‹ > wrote: Is this the

rida child sex den. Schoolchildren were among hundreds of callers who apparently rang to arrange massages for the 58-year-old billionaire friend of Prince Andrew, who was later convicted of child sex offences. And Ghislaine Maxwell, 49-year-old daughter of the disgraced media mogul Robert Maxwell, is apparent

for the 58-year-old billionaire friend of Prince Andrew, who was later convicted of child sex offences.

To: Mike Sitrick From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Wed 3/9/2011 2:36:04 AM Subject: Re: also the she has females was a message from the local massage parlor. not from

irfields, once at RAF Marham and once at RAF Horsham. Ills questions: flow did Epstein get permission to land at military bases? Did anyone — namely Prince Andrew — help him gel permission? EFTA_R1_00219275 EFTA01837627 Thomas S. Mulligan Member of the Firm Sitrick And Company 7 Times Square, Suite 2600

and at military bases? Did anyone — namely Prince Andrew — help him gel permission? EFTA_R1_00219275 EF

n <[email protected]> To: Gmax Sent: Wed Mar 09 15:53:41 2011 Subject: Fwd: FW: query from London Telegraph -- Forwarded messa e ----- From: Mike Sitrick Date: Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:41 AM Subject: FW: quay from London Telegraph To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> From: Thomas Mulligan Sen

g about the Sunday, March 13, 2011 article, "How Prince Andrew shared a room at Epstein's Caribbean hideaway wi

the Sunday, March 13, 2011 article, "How Prince Andrew shared a room at Epstein's Caribbean hideaway wi

To: Mike Sitrick Fran: Jeffrey Epste n Sent Tue 3/15/2011 2:34:37 PM Subject Re: Sunday Mail this would be our fig/sail:act with the editor , after weeks of art

011 Subject: I think that we need to use Prince Andrew as our pivot point. Anything we say that referenc

rom: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation ail.com> To: Mike Sitrick; Martin Weinberg Sent: Tue Mar 08 05:44:47 2011 Subject: I think that we need to use Prince Andrew as our pivot point. Anything we say that references him , will be given attention. I suggest that our statement include a categorical denail that an

From: "Mike Sitrick" <=I > To: [email protected]>, <=MIMI> Subject: Re: Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 15:03:55 +0000 Got it. Will work something up. Original Message

04:56 -0800 To: Mike Sitrick Cc: Tony Knight Subject: Re: my edits ; Alan Dershowitz< do we want to say the that the tabloid exageration due to Prince andrews involvement has now demonized Jeffreys conduct to that of a pedophile? do we want to specifically point out that virginias alllegations were fully

orts being published in effort to demonize Prince Andrew, the government did not charge, nor were there e

From: "Mike Sitrick" To: "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected]> Cc: "Tony Knight" • Subject: FW: my edits Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:56:18 +0000 From: Mike Sitrick

own and everyone out. I was frightened. The Palace system is frightening, and each step I turned or each action was wrong and I did not want to hurt Andrew one more time. So Jeffrey, this email is sent with a hope you accept, and understand a little of my side too. We are and have both been in the firi

From: Mike Sitrick To: Jeffrey Epstein <1 , Paul Tweed < CC: Martin Weinberg ccl Subject: RE: Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 13:00:01 +0000 Jeffrey My concern is unles

[email protected]> <=r> Front page Evening Standard: Andrew backed 100% by Queen" _ =br.),* ********* *****

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2011 7:49 PM To: Mike Sitrick Subject: Fwd: Forwarded message <=r>From: < gt; Date: Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:36 AM Subject: To: Jeffrey Epstein <=a href="mailto:jeevacation