Epstein Secrets

fferent news outlets (some of which he was likely paid for) 14, and he sat for an interview as part of an hour-long "documentary" called "Ghislaine, Prince Andrew and the Paedophile," which aired on the British channel ITV. He has engaged on Twitter with the journalist who wrote about him, and he has communic

hour-long "documentary" called "Ghislaine, Prince Andrew and the Paedophile," which aired on the British

.3d 273, 303 (2d Cir. 2006). Of course, individuals cannot be allowed to lie their way onto a jury. Writing for a unanimous Supreme Court, Justice Cardozo concluded: "If the answers to the questions [during voir dire] are willfully evasive or knowingly untrue, the talesman, when accepted, is a juror i

aintiff's spurious claims. Plaintiff's allegations of sexual abuse extend beyond just Ms. Maxwell and encompass many notable public figures, such as Prince Andrew and Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, as well as un-named "numerous American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a w

pass many notable public figures, such as Prince Andrew and Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, as wel

ngland, where all statements except the January 4 Statement one were made, the litigation privilege is broader than in the United States. As Justice Cardozo recognized, there the privilege exists whether the statements are relevant to the judicial proceedings or not. Andrews v. Gardiner, 224 N.Y. 440, 44

roud to have been named after. “Daniel Webster,” “Andrew Jackson” and “Oliver Wendell Holmes.” That’s what

e would say. “The court is a bully pulpit and we must make the most of it.” His favorite story was about the New York judge who complained, “Why does Cardozo always get the interesting cases,” referring to the great New York Court of Appeals Chief Judge (later Justice) who transformed tort law and other pa