Epstein Secrets

he laughed and said, “He owes me some favours.” Maybe he was just joking but it constantly surprised me that people with as much to lose as Bill and [Prince] Andrew weren’t more GM_00716 http:/Awww.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1363452/Bill-Clinton-15-year-old-masseuse-I-met-twice-claims-Epsteins-girl.htm| 2/7 H

or identified in FBI and subsequent civil proceedings against wealthy financier and registered sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. A photo of Epstein and the Duke of York, Prince Andrew, together last week compelled Ms Roberts to come forward. First employed as a 15-year-old as Epstein's masseuse, she alleges he groom

ch she was told to sit on his knee while he touched another woman's breast. Pictures: Prince Andrew and Virginia Roberts Latest from Mail on Sunday Ms Roberts told London newspaper The Mail on Sunday she was first flown to England on a private jet to meet the Prince in March 2001. The 17-year-old was told

at she was forced to have sex while underage with Prince Andrew, Duke of York. The second denial comes after two Sunday papers

usual use of an RAF base"; it went on to assert: "The Duke of York is facing renewed questions about his friendship

for hypocritical conduct in this most competitive field must surely be awarded to Chris Bryant, the former Foreign Office minister, who argued that Prince Andrew's indiscretions over Epstein and the sale of his home were so ill befitting a person in his position that he should be given "the honourable order of

eper; but, yes, I did notice a photograph in it of Epstein and his then girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell with Prince Andrew. This, of course, was before Andrew took on the job of being Britain's "special trade representative" — and long before the world knew of Epstein's involvement with teenage girls (not

"sexually exploited by Epstein's adult male peers including royalty". The story was accompanied by a photograph of Prince Andrew with his arm around Ms Roberts, taken in 2001. Although the newspaper went out of its way to emphasise that there was no suggestion that the Queen's second son had engaged in any

s received, which represents a further incentive to make any claims that would help keep her name in the public domain by attempting to link her to Prince Andrew and have what she has to to say be worth any money to those seeking to use her for their own means. All in all, given her record, which includes a n

rdless of balance or truth. Trying to tie Prince Andrew to Mr Epstein's story, is part of that larger pla

ast year. Of course, I've seen the photograph of the Duke of York with ut I have absolutely no recollection at al

ention to the fact that, prior to filing her civil suit against Mr Epstein, and long after she allegedly ceased to be employed by him as a masseuse, Ms Roberts fled the US to avoid being arrested and presumably be sent to EFTA00629466 jail for grand theft. Also I think it is probably fair to mention that

for hypocritical conduct in this most competitive field must surely be awarded to Chris Bryant, the former Foreign Office minister, who argued that Prince Andrew's indiscretions over Epstein and the sale of his home were so ill befitting a person in his position that he should be given "the honourable order of

eper; but, yes, I did notice a photograph in it of Epstein and his then girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell with Prince Andrew. This, of course, was before Andrew took on the job of being Britain's "special trade representative" — and long before the world knew of Epstein's involvement with teenage girls (not

usual use of an RAF base"; it went on to assert: "The Duke of York is facing renewed questions about his friendship

"sexually exploited by Epstein's adult male peers including royalty". The story was accompanied by a photograph of Prince Andrew with his arm around Ms Roberts, taken in zoos. Although the newspaper went out of its way to emphasise that there was no suggestion that the Queen's second son had engaged in any